NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 1937837" data-attributes="member: 478">I do not let the spell do anything, which is not in the description.So, where's the rule which states this?If you are so sure that the first part is not a valid part of the spell description, then there must be a clear rule somewhere, which differentiates flavor text from game mechanics.Got any quotes handy? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />And where is it contradicted? It's just explained. A mundanely disguised person is seen as what it is... a disguised person. A magically disguised person is also seen as what it is... the person without the disguise. That's not a contradiction, it's an explanation as to what that sentence actually means (because it is hardly sufficient by itself)... that it is meant to pierce magical effects, not mundane effects, since mundane effects are considered real and therefore are part of what something truely is, magic, however, is not. That's what the spell description basically says.Even if that is true... which I do not think, but anyways... it's exactly what the thread starter was asking for. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />ByeThanee</blockquote>

Verification