Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shadowdancer's Hide in plain Sight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hawken" data-source="post: 1938211" data-attributes="member: 23619"><p>I'll answer the original questions of this post before making any other comments.</p><p></p><p>The shadows conceal him while he moves (and for as long as he remains within 10' of some shadow). So, he would just have to make a Hide check as part of his move action, including any applicable bonuses or penalties. </p><p></p><p></p><p>In my campaigns it is a limited form of invisibility. As a supernatural ability for Shadowdancers, it is basically invisibility that is limited to immersion in or close proximity (10') to existing shadows (other than his/her own). If they leave the shadows or the shadows are removed, then they are as visible as anyone else. </p><p></p><p> Again, this is my interpretation used in my campaigns. The shadows that can be used are any shadows of any size cast by anyone or anything other than the Shadowdancer. </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I just finished a Ravenloft campaign with a Shadowdancer PC. Whenever he used his HiPS ability, I always described it as the shadows moving as if possessed of their own life and swallowing him from the sight of others. This made it a lot more interesting and eerie for NPCs as well as the PCs (including the Shadowdancer) rather than simply stating that he disappears.</p><p></p><p>I enjoyed reading the different takes on the ability in this thread. However, my attention was grabbed by the back and forth between Thanee and UltimaGabe. There shouldn't have been any arguement. Thanee nailed it on the first post. </p><p></p><p> </p><p>That's all there is to say about it. It's a magical ability for Shadowdancers, True Seeing penetrates magical effects that conceal or disguise. The ability of the spell to penetrate normal and magical darkness eliminates any possibility of concealment in shadows (the presence of which is required for HiPS to work) from the subject of True Sight who can see in darkness. </p><p></p><p>UltimaGabe's arguements about True Sight's limitations vs. HiPS are based on flaws. The requirement for shadows for the ability to work is not "flavor crap". By requiring the presence of shadows it is implied that (in whatever manner the DM decides) shadows are used to conceal the Shadowdancer--otherwise, no such requirement would be in place. Now since darkness is darker than shadow and True Seeing (TS) allows sight in darkness, the person with TS would clearly see the person using HiPS. TS does not foil physical means of concealment (fog, physical disguise, etc.) but darkness and shadow are not physical obstructions, they are ambient conditions of visibility which TS allows the subject to see clearly in. </p><p></p><p>What UltimaGabe is missing is the purpose of the TS spell; to see through all forms of magical concealment. Could the spell description have been worded better? Yes. Without a doubt. Did the writer/editor list every possible method of magical concealment? No. They don't have time or the space for that amount of text. They rightly believe that the DM, and not some rules-lawyer PC, will deduce the purpose and effect of the spell and what it can and cannot do. The PHB would be three or four times its already considerable size if spell descriptions had to include every possible situation that the spell can and cannot be used for. That has nothing to do with the spell being open ended or not. It gets the point across; TS penetrates magical concealment, not physical. The supernatural (magical) ability to use any shadow of any size within 10' to Hide (conceal) yourself from sight easily falls within the purview of a spell designed to penetrate magical concealments. </p><p></p><p>UltimaGabe is also assuming that he is the authority on flavor text and rules text and he is basing much of his arguments on that which is faulty logic. And he is wrong to say Thanee or anyone else is wrong about their decision on the matter. TS allows the user to see in darkness. If you can see in darkness you can see in the shadows that a Shadowdancer is magically manipulating to conceal themselves. </p><p></p><p>As for the Ranger ability of the same name, it only works in natural terrain which kind of makes sense for a Ranger. There are too many movies to name as an example where someone is hiding in plain sight (Predator after the waterfall with Schwarzenegger in the mud comes to mind) in natural terrain. That doesn't seem too far fetched or outrageous for a Ranger of that level.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hawken, post: 1938211, member: 23619"] I'll answer the original questions of this post before making any other comments. The shadows conceal him while he moves (and for as long as he remains within 10' of some shadow). So, he would just have to make a Hide check as part of his move action, including any applicable bonuses or penalties. In my campaigns it is a limited form of invisibility. As a supernatural ability for Shadowdancers, it is basically invisibility that is limited to immersion in or close proximity (10') to existing shadows (other than his/her own). If they leave the shadows or the shadows are removed, then they are as visible as anyone else. Again, this is my interpretation used in my campaigns. The shadows that can be used are any shadows of any size cast by anyone or anything other than the Shadowdancer. I just finished a Ravenloft campaign with a Shadowdancer PC. Whenever he used his HiPS ability, I always described it as the shadows moving as if possessed of their own life and swallowing him from the sight of others. This made it a lot more interesting and eerie for NPCs as well as the PCs (including the Shadowdancer) rather than simply stating that he disappears. I enjoyed reading the different takes on the ability in this thread. However, my attention was grabbed by the back and forth between Thanee and UltimaGabe. There shouldn't have been any arguement. Thanee nailed it on the first post. That's all there is to say about it. It's a magical ability for Shadowdancers, True Seeing penetrates magical effects that conceal or disguise. The ability of the spell to penetrate normal and magical darkness eliminates any possibility of concealment in shadows (the presence of which is required for HiPS to work) from the subject of True Sight who can see in darkness. UltimaGabe's arguements about True Sight's limitations vs. HiPS are based on flaws. The requirement for shadows for the ability to work is not "flavor crap". By requiring the presence of shadows it is implied that (in whatever manner the DM decides) shadows are used to conceal the Shadowdancer--otherwise, no such requirement would be in place. Now since darkness is darker than shadow and True Seeing (TS) allows sight in darkness, the person with TS would clearly see the person using HiPS. TS does not foil physical means of concealment (fog, physical disguise, etc.) but darkness and shadow are not physical obstructions, they are ambient conditions of visibility which TS allows the subject to see clearly in. What UltimaGabe is missing is the purpose of the TS spell; to see through all forms of magical concealment. Could the spell description have been worded better? Yes. Without a doubt. Did the writer/editor list every possible method of magical concealment? No. They don't have time or the space for that amount of text. They rightly believe that the DM, and not some rules-lawyer PC, will deduce the purpose and effect of the spell and what it can and cannot do. The PHB would be three or four times its already considerable size if spell descriptions had to include every possible situation that the spell can and cannot be used for. That has nothing to do with the spell being open ended or not. It gets the point across; TS penetrates magical concealment, not physical. The supernatural (magical) ability to use any shadow of any size within 10' to Hide (conceal) yourself from sight easily falls within the purview of a spell designed to penetrate magical concealments. UltimaGabe is also assuming that he is the authority on flavor text and rules text and he is basing much of his arguments on that which is faulty logic. And he is wrong to say Thanee or anyone else is wrong about their decision on the matter. TS allows the user to see in darkness. If you can see in darkness you can see in the shadows that a Shadowdancer is magically manipulating to conceal themselves. As for the Ranger ability of the same name, it only works in natural terrain which kind of makes sense for a Ranger. There are too many movies to name as an example where someone is hiding in plain sight (Predator after the waterfall with Schwarzenegger in the mud comes to mind) in natural terrain. That doesn't seem too far fetched or outrageous for a Ranger of that level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shadowdancer's Hide in plain Sight
Top