Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Shadowdark looks so good!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bill Zebub" data-source="post: 9472069" data-attributes="member: 7031982"><p>Nobody has to like this mechanic, but "very poor design" is opinion, not fact. Having played a lot of Shadowdark, the people I play with have found the mechanic to be a ton of fun. If you do the arithmetic you'll see that Shadowdark Wizards...assuming they don't have terrible Int...on average get a lot more spells per day than D&D Wizards. And, yes, it's on average so they will have both terrible days and awesome days.</p><p></p><p>And even when they run out of spells, Shadowdark mechanics mean that Wizards can contribute meaningfully with dagger or staff. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>'Clone' is not accurate here. 'Derived' is better. </p><p></p><p>But regardless, the impact of nearly ubiquitous infravision has been a source of complaints for years and years. You may not share the complaint, but if somebody is going to write a variant to D&D, targeting the features that a lot of people hate makes a lot of sense. Far from weird.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Umm....there's only one book. So I'm not sure what you're talking about here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is getting stranger and stranger. Long rests? Level 20? Are you sure you are talking about Shadowdark?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ok, I find that one of the strangest comment of all. We must have a very different view of what "like a board game" means. In my mind, a board game is one that uses rules to rigidly define what is and isn't permissible. In Monopoly, you can't improvise and try to convert your hotels to condos. That's simply not in the rules. </p><p></p><p>One of the most defining characteristics of RPGs, on the other hand, is that they free the player from those constraints. Players are encouraged to think of creative solutions to problems that aren't in the rules and weren't considered by the GM.</p><p></p><p>Now, everybody is free to play any RPG however they want. But in my experience the more mechanical options that get packed on the character sheet, and the more adjudication rules given to the GM, the more likely that the game gets played within the confines of those rules, and the less likely players are to improvise.</p><p></p><p>One of the things I have been loving about Shadowdark is that players spend less time looking at their character sheets, hoping to find some button to press to solve the problem, and more time inventing completely unexpected solutions to those problems. And as a GM I spend less time worrying about specific rules to adjudicate their ideas, and more time leaning into the Rule of Cool. It's a ton of fun, and really brings me back to how we played in junior high school 45 years ago.</p><p></p><p>So, yeah....I really don't understand the 'board game' comment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bill Zebub, post: 9472069, member: 7031982"] Nobody has to like this mechanic, but "very poor design" is opinion, not fact. Having played a lot of Shadowdark, the people I play with have found the mechanic to be a ton of fun. If you do the arithmetic you'll see that Shadowdark Wizards...assuming they don't have terrible Int...on average get a lot more spells per day than D&D Wizards. And, yes, it's on average so they will have both terrible days and awesome days. And even when they run out of spells, Shadowdark mechanics mean that Wizards can contribute meaningfully with dagger or staff. 'Clone' is not accurate here. 'Derived' is better. But regardless, the impact of nearly ubiquitous infravision has been a source of complaints for years and years. You may not share the complaint, but if somebody is going to write a variant to D&D, targeting the features that a lot of people hate makes a lot of sense. Far from weird. Umm....there's only one book. So I'm not sure what you're talking about here. This is getting stranger and stranger. Long rests? Level 20? Are you sure you are talking about Shadowdark? Ok, I find that one of the strangest comment of all. We must have a very different view of what "like a board game" means. In my mind, a board game is one that uses rules to rigidly define what is and isn't permissible. In Monopoly, you can't improvise and try to convert your hotels to condos. That's simply not in the rules. One of the most defining characteristics of RPGs, on the other hand, is that they free the player from those constraints. Players are encouraged to think of creative solutions to problems that aren't in the rules and weren't considered by the GM. Now, everybody is free to play any RPG however they want. But in my experience the more mechanical options that get packed on the character sheet, and the more adjudication rules given to the GM, the more likely that the game gets played within the confines of those rules, and the less likely players are to improvise. One of the things I have been loving about Shadowdark is that players spend less time looking at their character sheets, hoping to find some button to press to solve the problem, and more time inventing completely unexpected solutions to those problems. And as a GM I spend less time worrying about specific rules to adjudicate their ideas, and more time leaning into the Rule of Cool. It's a ton of fun, and really brings me back to how we played in junior high school 45 years ago. So, yeah....I really don't understand the 'board game' comment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Shadowdark looks so good!
Top