Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Khaalis" data-source="post: 1403983" data-attributes="member: 2167">&quot;The range at which the extra damage from a sneak attack can be applied is increased by 10 feet at level 2.&quot;I just feel this is ambiguous at best as worded is all.Its not a matter of balance versus magic items. You dont weigh what a class gets in BAB or Saves based on magic item availability so why use that argument for class abilities?It is a matter of:a) Show another class that grants 8 feats in 4 levels.b) Asside from granting 8 feats, it breaks the core &quot;balance&quot; factor on those feats by allowing them to stack.Again - JMHO, take it or leave it but I think that skill increases are broken as-is.&nbsp; Its far too many feats, and the broken stacking (which Also allows even more stacking by the actual Skill Focus feat) is just far to abusive - especially if you throw magic items into the equation on top of it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Khaalis, post: 1403983, member: 2167"] "The range at which the extra damage from a sneak attack can be applied is increased by 10 feet at level 2." I just feel this is ambiguous at best as worded is all. Its not a matter of balance versus magic items. You dont weigh what a class gets in BAB or Saves based on magic item availability so why use that argument for class abilities? It is a matter of: a) Show another class that grants 8 feats in 4 levels. b) Asside from granting 8 feats, it breaks the core "balance" factor on those feats by allowing them to stack. Again - JMHO, take it or leave it but I think that skill increases are broken as-is. Its far too many feats, and the broken stacking (which Also allows even more stacking by the actual Skill Focus feat) is just far to abusive - especially if you throw magic items into the equation on top of it. [/QUOTE]

Verification