Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shake It Off vs. Dazed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="weem" data-source="post: 4636333" data-attributes="member: 9470"><p>Here is where I am stuck (just gonna spew this out as I found a little bit of time real quick)...</p><p></p><p>As mentioned a few times, there are 3 parts to your turn.</p><p></p><p>1/ Start of Your Turn</p><p>2/ Actions on Your Turn</p><p>3/ End of Your Turn</p><p></p><p>We'll call these Acts 1, 2 and 3.</p><p></p><p>Your progress from Act 1 to Act 2 and finally to Act 3 during your turn.</p><p></p><p>There is no backwards movement, and in fact you can do "no actions" in Act 1 or Act 3.</p><p></p><p>Daze "occurs" at the Start of Your Turn, Act 1.</p><p></p><p>To me, "occurs" means it happens then. It is not occuring during Act 2, it already happened in Act 1. Like ongoing damage and regeneration, they are applied AND resolved in Act 1 - they begin and end their turn in other words.</p><p></p><p>When Daze is applied (Act 1), its effect is prevention of more than one action during Act 2. Like ongoing damage that has been taken, this is an effect that has happened already - it is not reversable.</p><p></p><p>Shake it Off allows the warlord or others to roll a save with a bonus.</p><p></p><p>--- For the Warlord, it occurs in Act 2.</p><p></p><p>--- For Others, it occurs in Act 0 (zero) before Act 1 of their next turn. Before the Daze would, in effect, get its chance to "occur". Other players are not moving backwards to stop an effect, but rather the warlord is preventing it from even getting to occur at all by killing it in Act 0.</p><p></p><p>When the warlord saves in Act 2 thanks to an ability, it does not (to me) mean you get to go undo an action that occured during Act 1 (again, could he not then go back and undo ongoing damage? take back what was taken from him already?). Rather, it means that you are getting to roll a save in round 2 in addition to round 3 - so 2 saves, which is great and one of them is with a bonus! even better. But you benefit from saves on your next turn, not the current one.</p><p></p><p>Everything in the book says (multiple times in fact) that saves occur at the end of the turn. Even if we assume (and we are) that this save for the warlord occurs during his actions turn (Act 2), nothing anywhere contradicts that the BENEFITS of a save (reasing conditions) occur on your NEXT turn (when you are suddenly free of a condition(S)).</p><p></p><p>To word it another way... the book says saves happen at the end of your turn... this equates to saying that the save you make in Act 3 (turn 1) doesn't do anything until Act 1 (turn 2) when it efectively 'destroys' the effect you were saving against. We invision it immediately removing the effect, but logically that would require moving backwards to Act 1... instead, it waits till Act 1 of the next turn and removes it.</p><p></p><p>With that said, I just don't see why in this case it moves back and stops what has already occured.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Anyway, it's not pretty and I don't expect to change any minds (not trying to) - that's just where I am coming from at the moment, which could change. I'm not claiming to be right, or that you are wrong - I enjoy the discussion and it's all positive right <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="weem, post: 4636333, member: 9470"] Here is where I am stuck (just gonna spew this out as I found a little bit of time real quick)... As mentioned a few times, there are 3 parts to your turn. 1/ Start of Your Turn 2/ Actions on Your Turn 3/ End of Your Turn We'll call these Acts 1, 2 and 3. Your progress from Act 1 to Act 2 and finally to Act 3 during your turn. There is no backwards movement, and in fact you can do "no actions" in Act 1 or Act 3. Daze "occurs" at the Start of Your Turn, Act 1. To me, "occurs" means it happens then. It is not occuring during Act 2, it already happened in Act 1. Like ongoing damage and regeneration, they are applied AND resolved in Act 1 - they begin and end their turn in other words. When Daze is applied (Act 1), its effect is prevention of more than one action during Act 2. Like ongoing damage that has been taken, this is an effect that has happened already - it is not reversable. Shake it Off allows the warlord or others to roll a save with a bonus. --- For the Warlord, it occurs in Act 2. --- For Others, it occurs in Act 0 (zero) before Act 1 of their next turn. Before the Daze would, in effect, get its chance to "occur". Other players are not moving backwards to stop an effect, but rather the warlord is preventing it from even getting to occur at all by killing it in Act 0. When the warlord saves in Act 2 thanks to an ability, it does not (to me) mean you get to go undo an action that occured during Act 1 (again, could he not then go back and undo ongoing damage? take back what was taken from him already?). Rather, it means that you are getting to roll a save in round 2 in addition to round 3 - so 2 saves, which is great and one of them is with a bonus! even better. But you benefit from saves on your next turn, not the current one. Everything in the book says (multiple times in fact) that saves occur at the end of the turn. Even if we assume (and we are) that this save for the warlord occurs during his actions turn (Act 2), nothing anywhere contradicts that the BENEFITS of a save (reasing conditions) occur on your NEXT turn (when you are suddenly free of a condition(S)). To word it another way... the book says saves happen at the end of your turn... this equates to saying that the save you make in Act 3 (turn 1) doesn't do anything until Act 1 (turn 2) when it efectively 'destroys' the effect you were saving against. We invision it immediately removing the effect, but logically that would require moving backwards to Act 1... instead, it waits till Act 1 of the next turn and removes it. With that said, I just don't see why in this case it moves back and stops what has already occured. Anyway, it's not pretty and I don't expect to change any minds (not trying to) - that's just where I am coming from at the moment, which could change. I'm not claiming to be right, or that you are wrong - I enjoy the discussion and it's all positive right ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shake It Off vs. Dazed
Top