Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shaman AC too low?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JonnyDoH" data-source="post: 4734619" data-attributes="member: 82923"><p>Yes, I suppose you have a point. Perhaps my experience playing 4th edition is a bit low-- on the other hand, IS there a reason why the Shaman should simply not Be In Combat? I mean, whatever happened to D&D, where every class had its drawbacks, people occasionally rolled a '3' for a stat (my healer with 4 charisma-- I was never forced to heal! Good times), and no one class was the ultimate death dealing machine to all creatures? </p><p></p><p>(rant)I suppose fourth edition made things more overpowered for everything in general-- but perhaps its adding "easy mode" for people who just want to min/max their characters. (/rant)</p><p></p><p>Sure, the Int based Shaman might have a higher AC overall than the Con Shaman, but the former is less geared toward healing and recovery of hitpoints (the latter having a more valuable bonus to both himself and his party members) and has less hitpoints overall than his counterpart (a slight disadvantage, but worth noting). </p><p></p><p>By virtue of healing ability, I would assume that the Con based Shaman is "more" valuable to the party overall, and should be protected as such. Plus, when you look at his abilities and those of his turducken, you see that party members have to be adjacent (most of the time) to said turducken in order to receive the benefits (Protecting Strike At Will Power comes to mind...). </p><p></p><p>One odd question: When an ability or feat says "ally" does it include the Shaman himself? I'm thinking along the lines of the feat "Protector Spirit Adept", which says your allies gain a +1 to Fort, will, ref while adjacent to your spirit companion... </p><p></p><p>Final Observation:</p><p>I think the Protector Spirit shaman engenders the idea of the Adventuring Party as a Tank. It moves with the solidarity of a single unit, with the Spirit Protector at the Center, lending various bonuses to those allies around it. In theory, it works like the phalanx of old. If used any differently, it seems to be a ludicrous tactic-- which is why so many people are questioning the Protector Shaman. Just my two cents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JonnyDoH, post: 4734619, member: 82923"] Yes, I suppose you have a point. Perhaps my experience playing 4th edition is a bit low-- on the other hand, IS there a reason why the Shaman should simply not Be In Combat? I mean, whatever happened to D&D, where every class had its drawbacks, people occasionally rolled a '3' for a stat (my healer with 4 charisma-- I was never forced to heal! Good times), and no one class was the ultimate death dealing machine to all creatures? (rant)I suppose fourth edition made things more overpowered for everything in general-- but perhaps its adding "easy mode" for people who just want to min/max their characters. (/rant) Sure, the Int based Shaman might have a higher AC overall than the Con Shaman, but the former is less geared toward healing and recovery of hitpoints (the latter having a more valuable bonus to both himself and his party members) and has less hitpoints overall than his counterpart (a slight disadvantage, but worth noting). By virtue of healing ability, I would assume that the Con based Shaman is "more" valuable to the party overall, and should be protected as such. Plus, when you look at his abilities and those of his turducken, you see that party members have to be adjacent (most of the time) to said turducken in order to receive the benefits (Protecting Strike At Will Power comes to mind...). One odd question: When an ability or feat says "ally" does it include the Shaman himself? I'm thinking along the lines of the feat "Protector Spirit Adept", which says your allies gain a +1 to Fort, will, ref while adjacent to your spirit companion... Final Observation: I think the Protector Spirit shaman engenders the idea of the Adventuring Party as a Tank. It moves with the solidarity of a single unit, with the Spirit Protector at the Center, lending various bonuses to those allies around it. In theory, it works like the phalanx of old. If used any differently, it seems to be a ludicrous tactic-- which is why so many people are questioning the Protector Shaman. Just my two cents. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shaman AC too low?
Top