Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Shane Hensley comments on the RPG industry
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thorin Stoutfoot" data-source="post: 420640" data-attributes="member: 1887"><p>Let me explain what I think Hellbender meant:</p><p></p><p>If I'm at the gaming store with $40 in my pocket, what would I get? Let's see. We have this game called "Godlike", and this game called "Nobilis"... But my chances of getting my D&D players to play either is slim.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, Monte Cook has this cool new super-adventure called "The BaneWarrens", and the new event book (an entirely new concept) called "Requim for a God." The new issue of Dungeon has a d20 Mecha game, which I'm sure I could get my D&D group to try for at least one evening, and then there's "Spycraft", which a lot of folks have been raving about.</p><p></p><p>So the issue isn't that I have a choice between mediocre d20 products done by hacks or superior, inspired non-d20 products that have been sweated by geniuses with PhDs. The issue is that I have a choice between d20 products sweated on by geniuses, and non-d20 products sweated on by other maybe geniuses that I've never heard about.</p><p></p><p>It's no wonder d20 products outsell the others, given the same amount of design and presentation quality as the non-d20 products. I'm not saying that "Godlike" or "Nobilis" doesn't sell, but I bet that if there had been excellent implementations of such games (Note that I don't know if such a thing is even possible) as d20 games, they'd sell an order of magnitude better, simply because a potential buyer isn't thinking to himself/herself "Would this be a hard sell for my gaming group?". For this reason and this reason alone, I'd consider buying Spycraft, but not Nobilis. I'd consider "Mutants and Masterminds", but not "Godlike", and definitely not "SAS d20", which at this point everyone has agreed is the equivalent of a wolf in sheep's clothing.</p><p></p><p>In other words, my advice to John Nephew, for instance, would be to find someone who loves d20 and is a talented designer and loves Ars Magica (a certain person with the initials JT comes to mind <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />, and get him to write the Ars Magica magic system as an extension to the d20 system. Advertise it as "the best new magic system to have ever been developed" (and if you manage to get JT to write it of course you should market the hell out of that!), and I bet that one new Core Rulebook will pay for 20 Ars Magica supplements!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thorin Stoutfoot, post: 420640, member: 1887"] Let me explain what I think Hellbender meant: If I'm at the gaming store with $40 in my pocket, what would I get? Let's see. We have this game called "Godlike", and this game called "Nobilis"... But my chances of getting my D&D players to play either is slim. On the other hand, Monte Cook has this cool new super-adventure called "The BaneWarrens", and the new event book (an entirely new concept) called "Requim for a God." The new issue of Dungeon has a d20 Mecha game, which I'm sure I could get my D&D group to try for at least one evening, and then there's "Spycraft", which a lot of folks have been raving about. So the issue isn't that I have a choice between mediocre d20 products done by hacks or superior, inspired non-d20 products that have been sweated by geniuses with PhDs. The issue is that I have a choice between d20 products sweated on by geniuses, and non-d20 products sweated on by other maybe geniuses that I've never heard about. It's no wonder d20 products outsell the others, given the same amount of design and presentation quality as the non-d20 products. I'm not saying that "Godlike" or "Nobilis" doesn't sell, but I bet that if there had been excellent implementations of such games (Note that I don't know if such a thing is even possible) as d20 games, they'd sell an order of magnitude better, simply because a potential buyer isn't thinking to himself/herself "Would this be a hard sell for my gaming group?". For this reason and this reason alone, I'd consider buying Spycraft, but not Nobilis. I'd consider "Mutants and Masterminds", but not "Godlike", and definitely not "SAS d20", which at this point everyone has agreed is the equivalent of a wolf in sheep's clothing. In other words, my advice to John Nephew, for instance, would be to find someone who loves d20 and is a talented designer and loves Ars Magica (a certain person with the initials JT comes to mind :), and get him to write the Ars Magica magic system as an extension to the d20 system. Advertise it as "the best new magic system to have ever been developed" (and if you manage to get JT to write it of course you should market the hell out of that!), and I bet that one new Core Rulebook will pay for 20 Ars Magica supplements! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Shane Hensley comments on the RPG industry
Top