Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Shane Hensley comments on the RPG industry
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 421346" data-attributes="member: 94"><p>I really don't mean this to sound as snarky as it is going to, but you aren't permitted to disagree. The d20 consumer doesn't grant you, the designer, that privelege. This is why you keep hearing the same complaints. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You are missing the point of the d20 logo. You never got past the point of thinking, "The d20 logo will help sell my game." There's nothing wrong with that; the problem is that you fail to deliver 100% on the promise that is implicitly made by the d20 logo-- to whit:</p><p></p><p><strong>This game is compatible with d20.</strong></p><p></p><p>The logo does not mean, "This game is compatible with d20, <em>with a few minor tweaks by the GM.</em>" </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ever step you take away from the d20 experience as delivered by D&D is a broken promise to the end user.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because you don't have ALL the basic elements in place. You must have them all. There must be a 1-to-1 analog, and you don't have it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See above. The d20 logo is your company's promise to the GM that even as little as 2 minutes of conversion should not be necessary. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I mean this with all respect, but if you still cannot grasp why it isn't, that's a fundamental flaw, and it is going to introduce flaws into every "d20 compatible" product you design. </p><p></p><p>Rather than riding the wave of d20, you seem to find yourself struggling to swim against the tide. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not true; it is not that people are not willing to separate D&D with d20. The problem is that D&D is the defining game for what d20 is. Folks do not expect you to deliver D&D in Tights, but they do expect you to remain consistent with the character creation, character advancement, and basic task resolution defined in the PHB. </p><p></p><p>If you find that the d20 logo stifles your ability to innovate, the solution is simple: <strong>DON'T USE IT.</strong> </p><p></p><p>You still have access to the OGL, you can innovate and tweak to your heart's desire, and you will not suffer the backlash of the broken d20 promise. You can't have it both ways; if you want to use the d20 logo, you must deliver d20. If you are not delivering d20, please don't be disingenuous and slap the d20 logo on your product.</p><p></p><p>That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wulf</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wulf Ratbane, post: 421346, member: 94"] I really don't mean this to sound as snarky as it is going to, but you aren't permitted to disagree. The d20 consumer doesn't grant you, the designer, that privelege. This is why you keep hearing the same complaints. You are missing the point of the d20 logo. You never got past the point of thinking, "The d20 logo will help sell my game." There's nothing wrong with that; the problem is that you fail to deliver 100% on the promise that is implicitly made by the d20 logo-- to whit: [b]This game is compatible with d20.[/b] The logo does not mean, "This game is compatible with d20, [i]with a few minor tweaks by the GM.[/i]" Ever step you take away from the d20 experience as delivered by D&D is a broken promise to the end user. Because you don't have ALL the basic elements in place. You must have them all. There must be a 1-to-1 analog, and you don't have it. See above. The d20 logo is your company's promise to the GM that even as little as 2 minutes of conversion should not be necessary. I mean this with all respect, but if you still cannot grasp why it isn't, that's a fundamental flaw, and it is going to introduce flaws into every "d20 compatible" product you design. Rather than riding the wave of d20, you seem to find yourself struggling to swim against the tide. ;) Not true; it is not that people are not willing to separate D&D with d20. The problem is that D&D is the defining game for what d20 is. Folks do not expect you to deliver D&D in Tights, but they do expect you to remain consistent with the character creation, character advancement, and basic task resolution defined in the PHB. If you find that the d20 logo stifles your ability to innovate, the solution is simple: [b]DON'T USE IT.[/b] You still have access to the OGL, you can innovate and tweak to your heart's desire, and you will not suffer the backlash of the broken d20 promise. You can't have it both ways; if you want to use the d20 logo, you must deliver d20. If you are not delivering d20, please don't be disingenuous and slap the d20 logo on your product. That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it. :) Wulf [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Shane Hensley comments on the RPG industry
Top