Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Shaping the world to the players
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Mhoram" data-source="post: 2746183" data-attributes="member: 4789"><p>This spins off from some commentary from the "G vs RP" thread, but I didn't want to clutter that up with another tangent. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /> </p><p></p><p>A question for GMs. How much do you shape your world to your players and their characters?</p><p></p><p>Do you have all the countries, politics, and structure between set up, and just let the characters go, like people in real life exploring and interacting with the world?</p><p></p><p>Do you have loose definitions, that solidify based on player actions?</p><p></p><p>Do you have things sorta set in stone, but allow it to change based on character/player interest.</p><p></p><p>How much of the tone is set beforehand.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I have my tone set, and it is usually very much a Good vs Evil tone - Paladins are very much a major social group in worlds I run. I do this because it is what I am comfortable wtih - If I tried to run a shades of grey game, it would be a really bad game, for everyone; just because I'm no good at it.</p><p></p><p>My world however is very very loose. I have the basic political structure set up, and what kind of things I plan to have where, but if the players in an adventure say something in passing like "Hey wouldn't it be cool if the city state we are heading to has slavery so we can topple the government and fix things".... you know, that will happen even if I never had anything like that planned.</p><p>The world, when I run a game, is there for no other reason than for the PCs to act in, and on. And I don't feel any attachment to any of the work I did in setting it up, if they completely change what I have done - of if in the course of play, they keep wanting things different than I had set up, and so I change it.</p><p></p><p>Because you know, when there characters are done, that world is too (unless they want to play generational).</p><p></p><p>I might use the same map, and have the same ground rules for the next campaign (then again I might not), but it starts fresh, and the new PCs will end up being the reason the world was invented.</p><p></p><p>That is my approach.</p><p></p><p>What is yours?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Mhoram, post: 2746183, member: 4789"] This spins off from some commentary from the "G vs RP" thread, but I didn't want to clutter that up with another tangent. :cool: A question for GMs. How much do you shape your world to your players and their characters? Do you have all the countries, politics, and structure between set up, and just let the characters go, like people in real life exploring and interacting with the world? Do you have loose definitions, that solidify based on player actions? Do you have things sorta set in stone, but allow it to change based on character/player interest. How much of the tone is set beforehand. I have my tone set, and it is usually very much a Good vs Evil tone - Paladins are very much a major social group in worlds I run. I do this because it is what I am comfortable wtih - If I tried to run a shades of grey game, it would be a really bad game, for everyone; just because I'm no good at it. My world however is very very loose. I have the basic political structure set up, and what kind of things I plan to have where, but if the players in an adventure say something in passing like "Hey wouldn't it be cool if the city state we are heading to has slavery so we can topple the government and fix things".... you know, that will happen even if I never had anything like that planned. The world, when I run a game, is there for no other reason than for the PCs to act in, and on. And I don't feel any attachment to any of the work I did in setting it up, if they completely change what I have done - of if in the course of play, they keep wanting things different than I had set up, and so I change it. Because you know, when there characters are done, that world is too (unless they want to play generational). I might use the same map, and have the same ground rules for the next campaign (then again I might not), but it starts fresh, and the new PCs will end up being the reason the world was invented. That is my approach. What is yours? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Shaping the world to the players
Top