Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Shards of the Silve Flame -- OOC thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anax" data-source="post: 2698435" data-attributes="member: 19868"><p>I'm sure drothgery has gotten to check out his ECS for Investigate by now, but here's a quick summary for future reference (and my take on it, so drothgery can correct me if he thinks it should work differently):</p><p></p><p></p><p>The Investigate feat (ECS, pp. 55-56) enables new uses for the Search skill--finding and analyzing clues. Clues are described specifically as being "physical, and can be seen, heard, touched, smelled, or tasted. A clue stands out because it is not a normal feature of the area being searched." Examples given are: a trampled flowerbed, a broken urn, a pin snapped off in a lock, a torn strip of cloak, a burnt scrap of scroll, or a brooch clutched in a dead man's fist.</p><p></p><p>If there are no clues that can be found, a successful use of Investigate doesn't turn anything up.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The base Search DC to find a clue (if there <em>is</em> a clue, now--this doesn't cons things up out of the ether) is 10, modified based on how disturbed the area being searched has been. +0 for an undisturbed location, +5 for a disturbed location (slightly and perhaps unintentionally. A good classical example would be bystanders walking around on a crime scene), and +10 for greatly disturbed (massively and intentionally--scrubbing down the area, etc.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Once a clue has been found, analyzing it requires a second DC 15 Search check. "By examining a body, you might determine whether the victim fought back or provided no struggle at all, or if claws, a weapon, or a spell killed the victim. By looking at a scorch mark on a wall, you might approximate the position of the spellcaster when the spell was cast."</p><p></p><p>The Search check to analyze a clue is modified by the circumstance, and how significant the insight provided by the clue is. The Search DC is increased by +2 for each day that's passed since the event in question (max +10), +0 if it's a minor clue (provides only a small piece of the solution), +2 for a moderate clue (provides significant data toward the solution of the puzzle and could lead to a conclusion without additional data), and +5 for a major clue (provides everything the investigator needs to solve a puzzle, although the solution may not be immediately obvious.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>A really good example that springs to mind of how these two things work together is a classic Sherlock Holmes snippet: Holmes notices that Watson's shoes are stained by a certain color of mud (find a clue). He then deduces that Watson has been to a specific part of town where new construction is happening, because it's spreading a lot of dirt about, of that specific hue (analyze it.) Holmes does this all as a free action, which clearly implies that Holmes is an epic character. *cough* <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For this specific case, I'm not sure whether Investigate even applies. I'm thinking in terms of the puzzle in question being why the fiends wanted Lord Alistair. An example of clues in the recent posting might be the drawings and journals. Analysis might be able to suggest what he was working on when the fiends came in, or perhaps provide some insight into what Lord Alistair's research was trending towards: Hariel probably wouldn't know about fiends in detail, but she might be able to deduce from the pattern of the research that some item is of greater significance, and draw that item to the attention of the people who do know more about fiends.</p><p></p><p>Investigate might also reveal as character knowledge some of the "what's going on" bits that were posted about how the fight came to be, with the silence spell to try to keep Kahlia from getting involved, etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Investigate is definitely one of those skills where it's totally up to the DM what information may or may not be gained from use, and how to provide that information. Sometimes, there won't be any use for it. Sometimes, it'll be an appropriate time to use it, but there still won't be anything useful to be gained. (Same sort of thing as Gather Information: sometimes there are no locals to talk to. Sometimes there are locals, but they don't know anything of import.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anax, post: 2698435, member: 19868"] I'm sure drothgery has gotten to check out his ECS for Investigate by now, but here's a quick summary for future reference (and my take on it, so drothgery can correct me if he thinks it should work differently): The Investigate feat (ECS, pp. 55-56) enables new uses for the Search skill--finding and analyzing clues. Clues are described specifically as being "physical, and can be seen, heard, touched, smelled, or tasted. A clue stands out because it is not a normal feature of the area being searched." Examples given are: a trampled flowerbed, a broken urn, a pin snapped off in a lock, a torn strip of cloak, a burnt scrap of scroll, or a brooch clutched in a dead man's fist. If there are no clues that can be found, a successful use of Investigate doesn't turn anything up. The base Search DC to find a clue (if there [i]is[/i] a clue, now--this doesn't cons things up out of the ether) is 10, modified based on how disturbed the area being searched has been. +0 for an undisturbed location, +5 for a disturbed location (slightly and perhaps unintentionally. A good classical example would be bystanders walking around on a crime scene), and +10 for greatly disturbed (massively and intentionally--scrubbing down the area, etc.) Once a clue has been found, analyzing it requires a second DC 15 Search check. "By examining a body, you might determine whether the victim fought back or provided no struggle at all, or if claws, a weapon, or a spell killed the victim. By looking at a scorch mark on a wall, you might approximate the position of the spellcaster when the spell was cast." The Search check to analyze a clue is modified by the circumstance, and how significant the insight provided by the clue is. The Search DC is increased by +2 for each day that's passed since the event in question (max +10), +0 if it's a minor clue (provides only a small piece of the solution), +2 for a moderate clue (provides significant data toward the solution of the puzzle and could lead to a conclusion without additional data), and +5 for a major clue (provides everything the investigator needs to solve a puzzle, although the solution may not be immediately obvious.) A really good example that springs to mind of how these two things work together is a classic Sherlock Holmes snippet: Holmes notices that Watson's shoes are stained by a certain color of mud (find a clue). He then deduces that Watson has been to a specific part of town where new construction is happening, because it's spreading a lot of dirt about, of that specific hue (analyze it.) Holmes does this all as a free action, which clearly implies that Holmes is an epic character. *cough* :) For this specific case, I'm not sure whether Investigate even applies. I'm thinking in terms of the puzzle in question being why the fiends wanted Lord Alistair. An example of clues in the recent posting might be the drawings and journals. Analysis might be able to suggest what he was working on when the fiends came in, or perhaps provide some insight into what Lord Alistair's research was trending towards: Hariel probably wouldn't know about fiends in detail, but she might be able to deduce from the pattern of the research that some item is of greater significance, and draw that item to the attention of the people who do know more about fiends. Investigate might also reveal as character knowledge some of the "what's going on" bits that were posted about how the fight came to be, with the silence spell to try to keep Kahlia from getting involved, etc. Investigate is definitely one of those skills where it's totally up to the DM what information may or may not be gained from use, and how to provide that information. Sometimes, there won't be any use for it. Sometimes, it'll be an appropriate time to use it, but there still won't be anything useful to be gained. (Same sort of thing as Gather Information: sometimes there are no locals to talk to. Sometimes there are locals, but they don't know anything of import.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Shards of the Silve Flame -- OOC thread
Top