Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="roguerouge" data-source="post: 5217841" data-attributes="member: 13855">Lack of stringent enforcement implies consent? I'm not sure I buy that. Certainly, people could make the same case for a lot of other copyrighted material on the interwebs.Absent the explicit consent of the creators, I'm not sure that this 5 copies thing lets people off the hook. After all, you have the right to make backup copies and copies for other locations under the precedents of space shifting and time shifting. The fact that the TOS seems to say don't share your password, the idea that 5 copies are permitted doesn't seem to trump that explicit statement.After all, RPGNow permits multiple downloads, but I don't construe that as implicit permission to send a copy to everyone I game with. Do you?Don't get me wrong, I think it's fabulous that WotC is not suing people for sharing. But thus far this seems like a rationalization, rather than the kind of explicit consent that Copyright Hawks insist on.</blockquote>