Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sharp shooter/Great Weapon Mastery
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 8795130" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>Back in <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/sharp-shooter-great-weapon-mastery.691972/post-8794399" target="_blank">post 200</a> I literally said "players need to be proficient in the same skill" & in <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/sharp-shooter-great-weapon-mastery.691972/post-8794734" target="_blank">207</a> I quoted the mechanic itself, why are you echoing what's already been said as if pointing out something unnoticed? It's pure good that players in that situation without proficiency in the same skill need to convince the gm how some other proficiency or some other thing should be allowed to work for <em>this</em> help action rather than the players being salty because the gm refused to allow it or because the GM wanted more than "and I help".</p><p></p><p>The help action being a codified action is part of a trend where a number of things now have codified actions the GM can choose to handwave or make an exception to rather than a vague unfilled outline the gm needs to browbeat the players with using questions like "do you want to use your action for that." Game design for a functional skill system is heavy in math, "rulings not rules" & 5e's collection of never ending unintended edge cases thrown to the gm to fix causes a lot of <a href="https://external-preview.redd.it/HBrUMd7zG-vRDudSZ1Qel3IbDrap4sXx9z1AvAGjgHw.jpg?auto=webp&s=32e822ab2880c6c2b3c0049b27ef017dde7781ad" target="_blank">these problems</a> the GM is left to fix or build around with consequences.</p><p></p><p>Did you not take the time to read the class? Hunters mark is cast with a first level slot with no concentration for one hour at level 1 for the new ranger giving them +1d6 each time the ranger damages the marked target. With a third & 5th level slot that jumps to 8 hours & 24 hours. Ranger gets those at levels higher than first at higher levels, no 4th level feat needed. Higher level ranger gets all kinds of things yes, the bard getting hex & ranger getting hunters mark variation was an example of why the outrage over not being able to dual wield rapiers was not reasonable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 8795130, member: 93670"] Back in [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/sharp-shooter-great-weapon-mastery.691972/post-8794399']post 200[/URL] I literally said "players need to be proficient in the same skill" & in [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/sharp-shooter-great-weapon-mastery.691972/post-8794734']207[/URL] I quoted the mechanic itself, why are you echoing what's already been said as if pointing out something unnoticed? It's pure good that players in that situation without proficiency in the same skill need to convince the gm how some other proficiency or some other thing should be allowed to work for [I]this[/I] help action rather than the players being salty because the gm refused to allow it or because the GM wanted more than "and I help". The help action being a codified action is part of a trend where a number of things now have codified actions the GM can choose to handwave or make an exception to rather than a vague unfilled outline the gm needs to browbeat the players with using questions like "do you want to use your action for that." Game design for a functional skill system is heavy in math, "rulings not rules" & 5e's collection of never ending unintended edge cases thrown to the gm to fix causes a lot of [URL='https://external-preview.redd.it/HBrUMd7zG-vRDudSZ1Qel3IbDrap4sXx9z1AvAGjgHw.jpg?auto=webp&s=32e822ab2880c6c2b3c0049b27ef017dde7781ad']these problems[/URL] the GM is left to fix or build around with consequences. Did you not take the time to read the class? Hunters mark is cast with a first level slot with no concentration for one hour at level 1 for the new ranger giving them +1d6 each time the ranger damages the marked target. With a third & 5th level slot that jumps to 8 hours & 24 hours. Ranger gets those at levels higher than first at higher levels, no 4th level feat needed. Higher level ranger gets all kinds of things yes, the bard getting hex & ranger getting hunters mark variation was an example of why the outrage over not being able to dual wield rapiers was not reasonable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sharp shooter/Great Weapon Mastery
Top