Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Olgar Shiverstone" data-source="post: 3353739" data-attributes="member: 5868">Yeah, Horde had pretty crappy production values -- it is virtually illegible.&nbsp; The current format works much better in color.&nbsp; For lower cost -- what's wrong with black and white?&nbsp; You know, white pages, black text?One other thing I didn't particularly care for in Slaughtergarde was the division of the adventure into multiple books.&nbsp; It can be done that way and done well, but having two-third of the adventure in one book and a third in another just seems silly.&nbsp; If you want two volumes, put all the adventure in one, and the maps in the second (and player stuff in a third, if that's important to you).With the new format, I'd prefer simply to keep everything in one volume.&nbsp; EtCR was good for that, plus it had nice production values. (minus the &quot;missing conclusion&quot; editting gaffe).(Oh, and maybe we could merge the Slaughtergarde threads?)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Olgar Shiverstone, post: 3353739, member: 5868"] Yeah, Horde had pretty crappy production values -- it is virtually illegible. The current format works much better in color. For lower cost -- what's wrong with black and white? You know, white pages, black text? One other thing I didn't particularly care for in Slaughtergarde was the division of the adventure into multiple books. It can be done that way and done well, but having two-third of the adventure in one book and a third in another just seems silly. If you want two volumes, put all the adventure in one, and the maps in the second (and player stuff in a third, if that's important to you). With the new format, I'd prefer simply to keep everything in one volume. EtCR was good for that, plus it had nice production values. (minus the "missing conclusion" editting gaffe). (Oh, and maybe we could merge the Slaughtergarde threads?) [/QUOTE]

Verification