Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shield Feint
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5163327" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Sorry, but you are not thinking this through.</p><p></p><p>Shield Feint and Brash Strike can be a very effective combination, especially later in an encounter when the Fighter is running out of other resources.</p><p></p><p>It allows the Fighter to keep one foe locked up and doubly encourages that foe to concentrate on the Fighter. The Fighter is not only hitting a lot, but the Fighter is also presenting a lower defense delta of 4 (2 for combat advantage, 2 for mark) over attacking someone else at a minimum of every other round (if the foe attacks the Fighter, it's worse for the foe if the foe attacks someone else).</p><p></p><p>Example:</p><p></p><p>Melee Ranger and Fighter are fighting foe.</p><p></p><p>Fighter hits foe with Shield Feint. Foe decides to ignore Fighter's mark and attack Ranger. Fighter attacks foe with Combat Challenge at +3. Ranger attacks foe.</p><p></p><p>Next Round. Fighter hits foe with Shield Feint. Foe decides to ignore Fighter's mark and attack Ranger. Fighter attacks foe with Combat Challenge at +3. Ranger attacks foe.</p><p></p><p>Next Round. Fighter hits foe with Shield Feint. Foe decides to ignore Fighter's mark and attack Ranger. Fighter attacks foe with Combat Challenge at +3. Ranger attacks foe.</p><p></p><p>Not only is the Fighter getting two attacks per round against this foe, but every time his Shield Feint hits, the second attack is at +3.</p><p></p><p>The Ranger can be healed. Allowing the Fighter to do more than double damage normal is suicidal. You've just turned the Fighter into a Striker and the foe effectively has two Strikers on him.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Foes should rarely ignore a Fighter, but ignoring him when he sometimes gets a +3 bonus to hit on his Combat Challenge and the chance to hit him is sometimes better than normal is just plain stupid most of the time. Attack the Ranger at -2 and give the Fighter an extra attack that is sometimes at +3, or attack the Fighter at +2. That's typically a no brainer for a monster.</p><p></p><p>The PCs already have 2 attacks to this foe's 1 per round. Changing that to 3 PC attacks to this foe's 1, just to attack the Ranger at -2 is typically silly, even without the +3 to hit on the Combat Challenge. Shield Feint encourages the foe to attack the Fighter even more and this specifically matches the role of the Fighter.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Compared to pushing or pulling a foe a square most of the time. No contest. Yes, there are situations where pushing or pulling a foe is awesome. They are just few and far between compared to pounding on the foe more often.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5163327, member: 2011"] Sorry, but you are not thinking this through. Shield Feint and Brash Strike can be a very effective combination, especially later in an encounter when the Fighter is running out of other resources. It allows the Fighter to keep one foe locked up and doubly encourages that foe to concentrate on the Fighter. The Fighter is not only hitting a lot, but the Fighter is also presenting a lower defense delta of 4 (2 for combat advantage, 2 for mark) over attacking someone else at a minimum of every other round (if the foe attacks the Fighter, it's worse for the foe if the foe attacks someone else). Example: Melee Ranger and Fighter are fighting foe. Fighter hits foe with Shield Feint. Foe decides to ignore Fighter's mark and attack Ranger. Fighter attacks foe with Combat Challenge at +3. Ranger attacks foe. Next Round. Fighter hits foe with Shield Feint. Foe decides to ignore Fighter's mark and attack Ranger. Fighter attacks foe with Combat Challenge at +3. Ranger attacks foe. Next Round. Fighter hits foe with Shield Feint. Foe decides to ignore Fighter's mark and attack Ranger. Fighter attacks foe with Combat Challenge at +3. Ranger attacks foe. Not only is the Fighter getting two attacks per round against this foe, but every time his Shield Feint hits, the second attack is at +3. The Ranger can be healed. Allowing the Fighter to do more than double damage normal is suicidal. You've just turned the Fighter into a Striker and the foe effectively has two Strikers on him. Foes should rarely ignore a Fighter, but ignoring him when he sometimes gets a +3 bonus to hit on his Combat Challenge and the chance to hit him is sometimes better than normal is just plain stupid most of the time. Attack the Ranger at -2 and give the Fighter an extra attack that is sometimes at +3, or attack the Fighter at +2. That's typically a no brainer for a monster. The PCs already have 2 attacks to this foe's 1 per round. Changing that to 3 PC attacks to this foe's 1, just to attack the Ranger at -2 is typically silly, even without the +3 to hit on the Combat Challenge. Shield Feint encourages the foe to attack the Fighter even more and this specifically matches the role of the Fighter. Compared to pushing or pulling a foe a square most of the time. No contest. Yes, there are situations where pushing or pulling a foe is awesome. They are just few and far between compared to pounding on the foe more often. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shield Feint
Top