Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shield Feint
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5163666" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>I didn't misread your post at all, let alone on purpose. You are the one making the claim without backing it up.</p><p></p><p>You said:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not terrible. That's all I was responding to.</p><p></p><p>The +3 boost is not going to happen every time. It's conditional. But, it might happen for a round or two. When it does, +5 is almost a guaranteed hit with Brash Strike, especially for a One Handed Weapon Talent Fighter (which many sword and board fighters are). So, the Fighter can have on each round using Shield Feint only:</p><p></p><p>a) +0, +3 or +0, +3 or +0, +3 or +0</p><p></p><p>or he can alternate it with Brash Strike:</p><p></p><p>+0, +5 or +2, +0, +5 or +2</p><p></p><p>The best case scenrio in four rounds for a) is +9 total and for b) is +10 total. For a), Shield Feint has to not be interrupted 3 times for the total +9. For b) Shield Feint has to not be interrupted 2 times for the total +10. The chances of the foe not being killed or moved, and the Fighter not being incapacitated is fairly slim over 4 rounds. It's very tough to get to that +9. Not quite as hard to get to the +10.</p><p></p><p>So just alternating averages more damage with Brash Strike with the Combat Advantage cost. A lot more damage, no. But, it not only does slightly more damage, it also incentivizes the foe to attack the Fighter: both because Combat Challenge at +3 is nastier, and because if the Fighter gets to a round to use Brash Strike, there is the 4 AC delta. And because the Fighter is weapon and shield, the shield offsets the combat advantage.</p><p></p><p>Tactics 101 dude. It's not terrible. It can be quite effective.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't suggest it for a non-human. But it is fine as part of a Human At Will repetoire.</p><p></p><p>So far, you haven't posted ANYTHING which illustrates that it is "terrible". You keep saying that you don't see a reason for it, but you have yet to post why it is terrible. What really is so bad about it?</p><p></p><p>You haven't even posted how it can be subpar to some other At Will option, let alone terrible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5163666, member: 2011"] I didn't misread your post at all, let alone on purpose. You are the one making the claim without backing it up. You said: It's not terrible. That's all I was responding to. The +3 boost is not going to happen every time. It's conditional. But, it might happen for a round or two. When it does, +5 is almost a guaranteed hit with Brash Strike, especially for a One Handed Weapon Talent Fighter (which many sword and board fighters are). So, the Fighter can have on each round using Shield Feint only: a) +0, +3 or +0, +3 or +0, +3 or +0 or he can alternate it with Brash Strike: +0, +5 or +2, +0, +5 or +2 The best case scenrio in four rounds for a) is +9 total and for b) is +10 total. For a), Shield Feint has to not be interrupted 3 times for the total +9. For b) Shield Feint has to not be interrupted 2 times for the total +10. The chances of the foe not being killed or moved, and the Fighter not being incapacitated is fairly slim over 4 rounds. It's very tough to get to that +9. Not quite as hard to get to the +10. So just alternating averages more damage with Brash Strike with the Combat Advantage cost. A lot more damage, no. But, it not only does slightly more damage, it also incentivizes the foe to attack the Fighter: both because Combat Challenge at +3 is nastier, and because if the Fighter gets to a round to use Brash Strike, there is the 4 AC delta. And because the Fighter is weapon and shield, the shield offsets the combat advantage. Tactics 101 dude. It's not terrible. It can be quite effective. I wouldn't suggest it for a non-human. But it is fine as part of a Human At Will repetoire. So far, you haven't posted ANYTHING which illustrates that it is "terrible". You keep saying that you don't see a reason for it, but you have yet to post why it is terrible. What really is so bad about it? You haven't even posted how it can be subpar to some other At Will option, let alone terrible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shield Feint
Top