Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Shield Master POLL: Rules as Fun!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 7580987" data-attributes="member: 6777737"><p>1. Push 5 feet is a <em>much</em> narrower effect of Shove compared to knock prone. It's situationally useful, has rider effects defined by the DM, and will rarely provide more benefit than "advantage on all melee attacks until start of next turn and half movement speed until end of next turn" without a situational ruling from the DM.</p><p></p><p>2. I specified the Dual Wielder feat, which explicitly removes the Light weapon requirement. Beyond that, your argument here is essentially that it doesn't work <em>at level 4</em> or for variant humans before level 5. It's a pretty rotten feat if it's only better at level 4.</p><p></p><p>2b. This is the scenario I'm presenting. Using a RAW reading, Shield Master is required to do Attack + Shove and Dual Wielder/Two Weapon Fighting is required to do Shove + Attack. However, given that Shove + Attack is better in a vacuum because the shove can benefit the character doing it, Dual Wielder is the better option for a shoving character.</p><p></p><p>Of course, if you're going for RAW readings, you get to entertain the argument that <a href="https://www.sageadvice.eu/2015/02/12/shield-bash/" target="_blank">a shield is an improvised weapon</a> and, therefore, Dual Wielder allows you to actually <em>attack</em> with a shield, making Dual Wielder the better shield user overall. Sure, you need Tavern Brawler to get proficiency to hit, but the additional +1 to AC on top of the sheild's +2 is really pretty ridiculous even in the face of evasion.</p><p></p><p>Sure, <a href="https://www.sageadvice.eu/2015/04/20/dual-wielder-and-shield/" target="_blank">Crawford says</a> that wasn't the <em>intent</em> and some later tweets <a href="https://www.sageadvice.eu/2015/11/18/a-shield-isnt-a-weapon/" target="_blank">avoid answering at all</a>, but when Crawford uses the "I" word, you pretty much know that the RAW support the more absurd reading. That is, of course, why a flat strict RAW reading is a bad idea in general.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bacon Bits, post: 7580987, member: 6777737"] 1. Push 5 feet is a [I]much[/I] narrower effect of Shove compared to knock prone. It's situationally useful, has rider effects defined by the DM, and will rarely provide more benefit than "advantage on all melee attacks until start of next turn and half movement speed until end of next turn" without a situational ruling from the DM. 2. I specified the Dual Wielder feat, which explicitly removes the Light weapon requirement. Beyond that, your argument here is essentially that it doesn't work [I]at level 4[/I] or for variant humans before level 5. It's a pretty rotten feat if it's only better at level 4. 2b. This is the scenario I'm presenting. Using a RAW reading, Shield Master is required to do Attack + Shove and Dual Wielder/Two Weapon Fighting is required to do Shove + Attack. However, given that Shove + Attack is better in a vacuum because the shove can benefit the character doing it, Dual Wielder is the better option for a shoving character. Of course, if you're going for RAW readings, you get to entertain the argument that [URL="https://www.sageadvice.eu/2015/02/12/shield-bash/"]a shield is an improvised weapon[/URL] and, therefore, Dual Wielder allows you to actually [I]attack[/I] with a shield, making Dual Wielder the better shield user overall. Sure, you need Tavern Brawler to get proficiency to hit, but the additional +1 to AC on top of the sheild's +2 is really pretty ridiculous even in the face of evasion. Sure, [URL="https://www.sageadvice.eu/2015/04/20/dual-wielder-and-shield/"]Crawford says[/URL] that wasn't the [I]intent[/I] and some later tweets [URL="https://www.sageadvice.eu/2015/11/18/a-shield-isnt-a-weapon/"]avoid answering at all[/URL], but when Crawford uses the "I" word, you pretty much know that the RAW support the more absurd reading. That is, of course, why a flat strict RAW reading is a bad idea in general. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Shield Master POLL: Rules as Fun!
Top