Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Shield Mastery Feat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhosDaDungeonMaster" data-source="post: 7554094"><p>But there in lies the rub... You can't lump them together IMO because they are different in individual ways. Precedents are fine except when special cases are in consideration, such as shoving and grappling. I also see nothing wrong with the wording in the PHB. Shoving and Grappling a special melee attacks involving contested Strength (Athletics) checks allowed when you use Attack action, just as Two-Weapon Fighting requires the use of a Bonus action when you take the Attack action. Opportunity attack is a reaction that allows a melee attack.</p><p></p><p>These are all things you can do with melee attacks provided criteria are met: using your reaction for an opportunity attack, using the Attack action along with the Bonus action in the case of two-weapon fighting, and using the Attack action and making a contested Strength (Athletics) check for grappling or shoving.</p><p></p><p><strong>Opportunity Attack</strong></p><p>(later on) "To make the opportunity attack, you use your reaction to make one melee attack against the provoking creature."</p><p></p><p>Here the OA allows one melee attack as a reaction. If it said "you can take one Attack action" instead of one melee attack, I would COMPLETELY agree with you! But, it doesn't... A melee attack is general and does not, by itself, meet the requirements of using an Attack action which is necessary to grapple or shove (or even two-weapon fight...).</p><p></p><p><strong>Grappling</strong></p><p>"When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple." If you don't use the Attack action, you can't make a melee attack, which means no grapple, either. The use of "can" simply means it is allowable, you "can" use it do make a grapple.</p><p></p><p><strong>Shove a Creature</strong></p><p>"Using the Attack action, you can make a special melee attack to shove a creature, either to knock it prone or push it away from you."</p><p></p><p>In both instances the use of the Attack action is explicit. Tell me, how can you grapple without the Attack action? It doesn't say "you can make a melee attack into a special melee attack, a grapple." In the case of Shove, it begins with "Using the Attack action," meaning you must use the Attack action, which can only be done on your turn (unless you take the Ready action, as previously discussed).</p><p></p><p>Yes, grappling and shoving are special melee attacks, but they are a <em>subset</em> of all melee attacks and <em>specific</em>. Because they are specific, the rules aren't exactly the same and these have special conditions. Similarly, there are special conditions for two-weapon fighting and opportunity attacks. If I use Second Wind, I can't two-weapon fight because both require my Bonus action. If I cast Shield, I can't make an opportunity attack when a creature moves out of my reach.</p><p></p><p>All that being said, I do agree with you in that I see nothing wrong with wanting to make a shove or grapple as an OA under the right circumstances. I just don't see that is what the wording in the PHB implies. Alas, we can agree to disagree on those interpretations. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhosDaDungeonMaster, post: 7554094"] But there in lies the rub... You can't lump them together IMO because they are different in individual ways. Precedents are fine except when special cases are in consideration, such as shoving and grappling. I also see nothing wrong with the wording in the PHB. Shoving and Grappling a special melee attacks involving contested Strength (Athletics) checks allowed when you use Attack action, just as Two-Weapon Fighting requires the use of a Bonus action when you take the Attack action. Opportunity attack is a reaction that allows a melee attack. These are all things you can do with melee attacks provided criteria are met: using your reaction for an opportunity attack, using the Attack action along with the Bonus action in the case of two-weapon fighting, and using the Attack action and making a contested Strength (Athletics) check for grappling or shoving. [B]Opportunity Attack[/B] (later on) "To make the opportunity attack, you use your reaction to make one melee attack against the provoking creature." Here the OA allows one melee attack as a reaction. If it said "you can take one Attack action" instead of one melee attack, I would COMPLETELY agree with you! But, it doesn't... A melee attack is general and does not, by itself, meet the requirements of using an Attack action which is necessary to grapple or shove (or even two-weapon fight...). [B]Grappling[/B] "When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple." If you don't use the Attack action, you can't make a melee attack, which means no grapple, either. The use of "can" simply means it is allowable, you "can" use it do make a grapple. [B]Shove a Creature[/B] "Using the Attack action, you can make a special melee attack to shove a creature, either to knock it prone or push it away from you." In both instances the use of the Attack action is explicit. Tell me, how can you grapple without the Attack action? It doesn't say "you can make a melee attack into a special melee attack, a grapple." In the case of Shove, it begins with "Using the Attack action," meaning you must use the Attack action, which can only be done on your turn (unless you take the Ready action, as previously discussed). Yes, grappling and shoving are special melee attacks, but they are a [I]subset[/I] of all melee attacks and [I]specific[/I]. Because they are specific, the rules aren't exactly the same and these have special conditions. Similarly, there are special conditions for two-weapon fighting and opportunity attacks. If I use Second Wind, I can't two-weapon fight because both require my Bonus action. If I cast Shield, I can't make an opportunity attack when a creature moves out of my reach. All that being said, I do agree with you in that I see nothing wrong with wanting to make a shove or grapple as an OA under the right circumstances. I just don't see that is what the wording in the PHB implies. Alas, we can agree to disagree on those interpretations. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Shield Mastery Feat
Top