Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Markn" data-source="post: 2298105" data-attributes="member: 21827">Damage with no typeI would have to say that the damage is unspecified and thus no reductions of any kind can be used by the cleric to reduce the damage further.&nbsp; Any damage that the fighter takes, which could be reduced by any defenses on the fighter, leaves damaged divided by 2 that are split between the cleric and the fighter.&nbsp; In case I am not clear here is my example - Fighter takes 50hp fire damage, he has resistence 10 so only takes 40hp damage.&nbsp; The 40 is divided by 2 and 20hp damage of unspecified damage type go to the cleric (even if he had fire resistence he still takes the 20) and the fighter takes 20.&nbsp; IMO, this is logical, not subject to rule abuse and seems to be backed by the letter and intent of the rules.In the case of subdual damage, none is applied to the cleric since Hyp himself pointed out this is done differently than normal damage.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Markn, post: 2298105, member: 21827"] [b]Damage with no type[/b] I would have to say that the damage is unspecified and thus no reductions of any kind can be used by the cleric to reduce the damage further. Any damage that the fighter takes, which could be reduced by any defenses on the fighter, leaves damaged divided by 2 that are split between the cleric and the fighter. In case I am not clear here is my example - Fighter takes 50hp fire damage, he has resistence 10 so only takes 40hp damage. The 40 is divided by 2 and 20hp damage of unspecified damage type go to the cleric (even if he had fire resistence he still takes the 20) and the fighter takes 20. IMO, this is logical, not subject to rule abuse and seems to be backed by the letter and intent of the rules. In the case of subdual damage, none is applied to the cleric since Hyp himself pointed out this is done differently than normal damage. [/QUOTE]

Verification