Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shield Spell, target: you
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Destil" data-source="post: 390554" data-attributes="member: 1980"><p>Shouldn't this spell have an entry of</p><p><strong>Range:</strong> Personal</p><p><strong>Effect:</strong> An invisible, mobile disk of force</p><p></p><p>Rather than it's current target of you? This makes more sense to me, though it may technichly put the spell in the evocation or even conjuration school... This also removes the sillyness of a potion of shield (since potions require a spell that targets a creature or creatures)...</p><p></p><p>Other spells for refrence:</p><p></p><p><em>Magic Circle Against</em>, and <em>Antimagic Field</em> are both listed with areas, not targets (<em>Magic Circle Against</em>, of course, refrences <em>Protection From</em> which does have a target, but that tells you that it can be cast on one creature). <em>Anitmagic Field</em> ... though <em>Fire Shield</em> is listed as having a personal range and a target of you, when it's an evocation to boot.... humm...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thoughts? Not a huge issue, it's really only a problem if you want to get rid of potions of shield... but still, it's interesting. The way I see it, spells that don't dirrectly affect you and have a personal range should have effects or areas, not a target of you... if for nothing else it makes potions make far more sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Destil, post: 390554, member: 1980"] Shouldn't this spell have an entry of [b]Range:[/b] Personal [b]Effect:[/b] An invisible, mobile disk of force Rather than it's current target of you? This makes more sense to me, though it may technichly put the spell in the evocation or even conjuration school... This also removes the sillyness of a potion of shield (since potions require a spell that targets a creature or creatures)... Other spells for refrence: [i]Magic Circle Against[/i], and [i]Antimagic Field[/i] are both listed with areas, not targets ([i]Magic Circle Against[/i], of course, refrences [i]Protection From[/i] which does have a target, but that tells you that it can be cast on one creature). [i]Anitmagic Field[/i] ... though [i]Fire Shield[/i] is listed as having a personal range and a target of you, when it's an evocation to boot.... humm... Thoughts? Not a huge issue, it's really only a problem if you want to get rid of potions of shield... but still, it's interesting. The way I see it, spells that don't dirrectly affect you and have a personal range should have effects or areas, not a target of you... if for nothing else it makes potions make far more sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shield Spell, target: you
Top