Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ranes" data-source="post: 6377635" data-attributes="member: 4826">This is the way I've always run 3e and will continue to do so. Should I run 5e, I won't. The rules have eased up and my players would expect me to go along with that, which is fine.Fair enough but magic is too big a deal for me to hand-wave away any of the component requirements. As you point out, they often serve the drama, more often than not in my experience.In 3e we had options like Silent Spell, Still Spell, Eschew Materials. Given 5e still has V, S and M elements, I wouldn't be surprised to see the equivalent of 3e's feat options appearing (I don't know if any already have; I only have the basic rules, so far).</blockquote>