Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 289697" data-attributes="member: 2011">Re: The Sage's Word on the SubjectWell, this isn't proof at all. The books merely have an inconsistency between crafting rules and what Magic Weapon and Shillelagh indicate straight up. The interpretation problem is that people seeing that inconsistency allow the wording the those spells to be open ended enough in their minds, but only because the double weapon crafting rules exist.But, if the double weapon crafting rules did not exist (i.e. no mention of double weapons were made at all in the crafting rules, just like no mention of two handed explicit crafting rules exist), I doubt very many people would be on the one end bandwagon. In fact, the concept of it may have never arisen.The Sage's ruling is, however, consistent with the crafting rules and is a fine (semi-) official resolution to the issue.The Sage is such a putz. I agree with you that he probably meant D10+1/D6, but can he ever just answer the question as asked? Nooooo. Almost every Email he ever answers has something questionable or debatable in it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes    :rolleyes:"  data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></blockquote>