Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shooting arrows through a Wall of Fire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phindar" data-source="post: 3489601" data-attributes="member: 37198"><p>It is strange that it doesn't mention unattended objects, but its not that strange. <em>Fireball</em> says it affects creatures and unattended objects, but most other spells including <em>Flame Strike</em> and <em>Scorching Ray</em> just mention creatures. What I was alluding too earlier is that if every spell that didn't mention objects was listed in Stormwrack as not starting fires, it would make sense. But it doesn't work out quite that neatly; the Stormwrack is a lot more random than that, and in any event the list is to check if the spell sets the ship on fire, the spells still deal hit point damage to the areas of the ship within the AoE unless the spell description specifically calls out it doesn't effect objects. </p><p></p><p>(Personally, I don't particularly care for the Fire Starting list in Stormwrack, because there has to be an easier way than to list a bunch of spells and determining individually if one starts a fire or not. What's wrong with just saying Fire Spells have a chance to start fires? I can remember that. Percentage chance equal to damage taken.) </p><p></p><p>I still say Opaque means you can't see through it. As in:</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd say Transparent, No Miss Chance. Translucent, 20% Miss Chance. Opaque, 50% Miss Chance (blind fire). (Though I'll admit that "4. hard to understand; not clear or lucid; obscure: <em>The problem remains opaque despite explanations.</em>" seems applicable as well.) </p><p></p><p>I'd say absent of something specific in the book, that dealing the spell damage to the objects passing through seems to be as by-the-book as you can make it. I'd deal half damage to objects, but to each his own. Non-magical arrows probably wouldn't make it through (but hey, they're cheap), magical arrows and beefier weapons (spears, daggers, hand axes) probably would, but they'd come out pretty singed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phindar, post: 3489601, member: 37198"] It is strange that it doesn't mention unattended objects, but its not that strange. [i]Fireball[/i] says it affects creatures and unattended objects, but most other spells including [i]Flame Strike[/i] and [i]Scorching Ray[/i] just mention creatures. What I was alluding too earlier is that if every spell that didn't mention objects was listed in Stormwrack as not starting fires, it would make sense. But it doesn't work out quite that neatly; the Stormwrack is a lot more random than that, and in any event the list is to check if the spell sets the ship on fire, the spells still deal hit point damage to the areas of the ship within the AoE unless the spell description specifically calls out it doesn't effect objects. (Personally, I don't particularly care for the Fire Starting list in Stormwrack, because there has to be an easier way than to list a bunch of spells and determining individually if one starts a fire or not. What's wrong with just saying Fire Spells have a chance to start fires? I can remember that. Percentage chance equal to damage taken.) I still say Opaque means you can't see through it. As in: I'd say Transparent, No Miss Chance. Translucent, 20% Miss Chance. Opaque, 50% Miss Chance (blind fire). (Though I'll admit that "4. hard to understand; not clear or lucid; obscure: [i]The problem remains opaque despite explanations.[/i]" seems applicable as well.) I'd say absent of something specific in the book, that dealing the spell damage to the objects passing through seems to be as by-the-book as you can make it. I'd deal half damage to objects, but to each his own. Non-magical arrows probably wouldn't make it through (but hey, they're cheap), magical arrows and beefier weapons (spears, daggers, hand axes) probably would, but they'd come out pretty singed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shooting arrows through a Wall of Fire
Top