Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shortened buff spell durations: Good or bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bauglir" data-source="post: 916130" data-attributes="member: 6982"><p>The basic buffs have versatility and wide appeal, not massive power - a bull's strength has combat, and non-combat applications; for any fighting class in combat, or to help with carrying heavy goods for example. When the buffs are kept in second level, then barring at the lowest levels they will not dominate many spell lists. Also items provide extra bonuses (bonus spells for example) and are not so easily dispelled; there is a benefit to choosing the item over the spell. Sounds a lot like balance to me.</p><p></p><p>Then you introduce empower spell, and you have a problem. People begin empowering the spells to combine their versatility with power (possible to get +12 to a stat by using an 8th level slot) - this is where the real problem lies imo.</p><p></p><p>So change the d4+1 to a straight 4 and you get balance once again. Only the second level slots are used to buff, and the buffs maintain their utility out of combat. However WotC did not stop there; they also reduced the duration making them near useless outside combat; further of extremely limited use in combat (unless one is prepared for the fight they will not be in place, and given the durations of combats, it is ill-advised to use them once combat starts)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Buffs' intended use are to be shared around. A wizard that keeps the bulls strength for himself is not the brightest bulb in the box. And I know wizards use int, clerics use wisdom etc. What's your point?</p><p></p><p>Secondly these spells are not 'so important to me.' Just because I have a differing point of view to you does not necessarily mean I have a vested interest. In fact I play a sorcerer (the only spellcaster) in my current game, with no buffs at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course they don't. They <em>can't</em>. Common sense would tell you my post was referring to arcane casters.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not true ime.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And nobody in my game has buffs. They can get that done for them in items.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bauglir, post: 916130, member: 6982"] The basic buffs have versatility and wide appeal, not massive power - a bull's strength has combat, and non-combat applications; for any fighting class in combat, or to help with carrying heavy goods for example. When the buffs are kept in second level, then barring at the lowest levels they will not dominate many spell lists. Also items provide extra bonuses (bonus spells for example) and are not so easily dispelled; there is a benefit to choosing the item over the spell. Sounds a lot like balance to me. Then you introduce empower spell, and you have a problem. People begin empowering the spells to combine their versatility with power (possible to get +12 to a stat by using an 8th level slot) - this is where the real problem lies imo. So change the d4+1 to a straight 4 and you get balance once again. Only the second level slots are used to buff, and the buffs maintain their utility out of combat. However WotC did not stop there; they also reduced the duration making them near useless outside combat; further of extremely limited use in combat (unless one is prepared for the fight they will not be in place, and given the durations of combats, it is ill-advised to use them once combat starts) Buffs' intended use are to be shared around. A wizard that keeps the bulls strength for himself is not the brightest bulb in the box. And I know wizards use int, clerics use wisdom etc. What's your point? Secondly these spells are not 'so important to me.' Just because I have a differing point of view to you does not necessarily mean I have a vested interest. In fact I play a sorcerer (the only spellcaster) in my current game, with no buffs at all. Of course they don't. They [i]can't[/i]. Common sense would tell you my post was referring to arcane casters. Not true ime. And nobody in my game has buffs. They can get that done for them in items. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shortened buff spell durations: Good or bad?
Top