Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should 2014 Half Elves and Half Orcs be added to the 2025 SRD?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Not a Decepticon" data-source="post: 9468200" data-attributes="member: 7020527"><p>Try telling that people who screech whenever you point out World War I pararells in his work, they will tell you he 100% did not mean any symbol, metaphor and you are bad person (they'll probably throw in some slurs for leftists here) for even suggesting a single phrase in his writing could be a symbol or metaphor for anything.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And tell me exactly, how is this set dressing in any way inherently better from the set dressing of "turtle"? or "small green people that pee in the milk?". Why is Hobbit inherently more relatable from Kobold or Elf from Dragonborn?</p><p></p><p></p><p>You guys are defending argument the fantasy HAS TO HAVE HUMANS TO BE RELATABLE TO THE AUDIENCES. And I think nothing proves how indefensible it is than the fact you constantly run into denying Hobbits in LotR are separate race. You are so close to getting the truth and still run away last minute to pick dumbest hill to die on.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So you agree? That we don't need to force humans into the story to make it relatable? That literally anything, even freaking rabbits and moles and rats and piglets and bears, can be made relatable to the audience?</p><p></p><p></p><p>And yet, the whole argument I am arguing against is that it will always be inherently stupid and silly to have Kobolds or Tortles be the heroes because human audience will inherently reject them and favor human (AND ONLY HUMAN) perspective. I think you guys are just biased and refuse to let go of tradition.</p><p></p><p>And, for the record, while it begun as a parody, TMNT has a long history of stories of all kinds of tone and theme. So do many long-running franchises, like Transformers or Sonic the Hedgehog. Again, this is extremely arbitrary that I'm supposed to find decades of stories that dwelt into horror, tragedy and uplifting as often, as they dwelled into comedy, inherently sillier and stupider than whatever the f is Spider-Man doing, just because he looks human. This line of thinking is what leads to humans being shoehorned into Transformers stories. And trust me, it is veeery hard to make Transformers fans like the humans, despite this assumption they should be inherently more relatable. We can relate to giant robots jsut fine, we don't need forced human perspective, arguing we do is condescending nad treating us like morons.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Not a Decepticon, post: 9468200, member: 7020527"] Try telling that people who screech whenever you point out World War I pararells in his work, they will tell you he 100% did not mean any symbol, metaphor and you are bad person (they'll probably throw in some slurs for leftists here) for even suggesting a single phrase in his writing could be a symbol or metaphor for anything. And tell me exactly, how is this set dressing in any way inherently better from the set dressing of "turtle"? or "small green people that pee in the milk?". Why is Hobbit inherently more relatable from Kobold or Elf from Dragonborn? You guys are defending argument the fantasy HAS TO HAVE HUMANS TO BE RELATABLE TO THE AUDIENCES. And I think nothing proves how indefensible it is than the fact you constantly run into denying Hobbits in LotR are separate race. You are so close to getting the truth and still run away last minute to pick dumbest hill to die on. So you agree? That we don't need to force humans into the story to make it relatable? That literally anything, even freaking rabbits and moles and rats and piglets and bears, can be made relatable to the audience? And yet, the whole argument I am arguing against is that it will always be inherently stupid and silly to have Kobolds or Tortles be the heroes because human audience will inherently reject them and favor human (AND ONLY HUMAN) perspective. I think you guys are just biased and refuse to let go of tradition. And, for the record, while it begun as a parody, TMNT has a long history of stories of all kinds of tone and theme. So do many long-running franchises, like Transformers or Sonic the Hedgehog. Again, this is extremely arbitrary that I'm supposed to find decades of stories that dwelt into horror, tragedy and uplifting as often, as they dwelled into comedy, inherently sillier and stupider than whatever the f is Spider-Man doing, just because he looks human. This line of thinking is what leads to humans being shoehorned into Transformers stories. And trust me, it is veeery hard to make Transformers fans like the humans, despite this assumption they should be inherently more relatable. We can relate to giant robots jsut fine, we don't need forced human perspective, arguing we do is condescending nad treating us like morons. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should 2014 Half Elves and Half Orcs be added to the 2025 SRD?
Top