Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should 5E have Healing Surges?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5808124" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>Again, I agree with you.</p><p></p><p>As I said WotC is taking a real risk here.</p><p></p><p>But if they were going with your logic then why change, just double down on your 4E fan base.</p><p></p><p>I don't think this is a good assessment.</p><p></p><p>They had a HUGE fan base. And 3E ran its life cycle. It makes sense. When 4E was announced I was completely on board because I thought it was time to move forward. But you can't judge a game by its popularity at the end of the cycle. The 3E/D20 era has repeatedly been called the second Golden Age and was criticized for glut and pushing out innovation in other games. It was hugely popular for quite a few years.</p><p></p><p>4E was on shelves in June 2008. Fans were crowing about it being a New York Times Bestseller. According to recent WotC statements they decided to start work on 5E in "late 2010". So in 18 MONTHS (at most) WotC threw in the towel internally. And it was easy to see along the way, but it is far easier to see now with 20/20 hindsight that they were desperately trying to "fix" the game and salvage their fan base for quite some time. In 18 months they had time to go from bestseller to realizing they had a problem, thinking of an developing solutions to try, publishing the solutions, looking for the results of that change, and then realizing they needed to go new edition.</p><p></p><p>You are comparing a game at the end of its life cycle to a game that, frankly, never had a life cycle.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope. That isn't true.</p><p></p><p>I do agree that the designers should be thinking "EVERY FAN". They should have a positive attitude and an aggressive approach. But from a real business point of view, getting back to being the icon of RPGs will be more than viable and is a realistic goal.</p><p></p><p>Anyone on the design team that doesn't want "EVERY FAN" should be off the team.</p><p>Anyone on the design team who has not learned the lessons of the past few years should also be off the team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 5808124, member: 957"] Again, I agree with you. As I said WotC is taking a real risk here. But if they were going with your logic then why change, just double down on your 4E fan base. I don't think this is a good assessment. They had a HUGE fan base. And 3E ran its life cycle. It makes sense. When 4E was announced I was completely on board because I thought it was time to move forward. But you can't judge a game by its popularity at the end of the cycle. The 3E/D20 era has repeatedly been called the second Golden Age and was criticized for glut and pushing out innovation in other games. It was hugely popular for quite a few years. 4E was on shelves in June 2008. Fans were crowing about it being a New York Times Bestseller. According to recent WotC statements they decided to start work on 5E in "late 2010". So in 18 MONTHS (at most) WotC threw in the towel internally. And it was easy to see along the way, but it is far easier to see now with 20/20 hindsight that they were desperately trying to "fix" the game and salvage their fan base for quite some time. In 18 months they had time to go from bestseller to realizing they had a problem, thinking of an developing solutions to try, publishing the solutions, looking for the results of that change, and then realizing they needed to go new edition. You are comparing a game at the end of its life cycle to a game that, frankly, never had a life cycle. Nope. That isn't true. I do agree that the designers should be thinking "EVERY FAN". They should have a positive attitude and an aggressive approach. But from a real business point of view, getting back to being the icon of RPGs will be more than viable and is a realistic goal. Anyone on the design team that doesn't want "EVERY FAN" should be off the team. Anyone on the design team who has not learned the lessons of the past few years should also be off the team. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should 5E have Healing Surges?
Top