Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should 5e have more classes (Poll and Discussion)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hatmatter" data-source="post: 8087621" data-attributes="member: 75077"><p>I would like to see a Warlord class, as I liked it in 4th edition...it felt fresh and new. I know that there are 5th edition Warlords out there, and I have only skimmed them, but maybe you all could tell me what you think of this idea: A warlord as a fighter subclass where there are various tactical and warlord-appropriate subclass abilities, something akin to Battlemaster and Cavalier as some have said, but more unique and appropriate to a warlord subclass. Yet, this subclass would have the following addition: The warlord subclass could share its Second Wind, Action Surge, Extra Attack, and Indomitable fighter features with a selected ally or allies within a set range. In the case of Second Wind, Action Surge, and Indomitable Wind, because the way the features are written, these could only be shared with a single ally per round (e.g. A 17th-level fighter who has two action surges could give an action surge to one ally, perhaps a wizard, in one round and the following round could use it him or herself, could share it with the wizard again, or share it with a different ally); yet the Extra Attack feature could be divided among different allies each round. So, an 11th-level fighter warlord who gets 3 attacks/round might forgo an attack action one round and give all three extra attacks to a single character. The next round, the fighter warlord might use one attack and give the remaining 2 attacks to two different allies, the next round, the fighter warlord might forgo an attack and spread the 3 attacks to 3 different allies, the next round the fighter warlord might use all 3 attacks him or herself.</p><p></p><p>I thought that might be a cool and elegant way to use the existing fighter class but do so in an interesting way that really enhances one's allies. I like the idea of the fighter warlord (who has reached 5th level when the fighter gets Extra Attack) distributing extra attacks as he or she directs his comrades using superior tactical knowledge and experience. Also, it would feel way different from the cleric.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hatmatter, post: 8087621, member: 75077"] I would like to see a Warlord class, as I liked it in 4th edition...it felt fresh and new. I know that there are 5th edition Warlords out there, and I have only skimmed them, but maybe you all could tell me what you think of this idea: A warlord as a fighter subclass where there are various tactical and warlord-appropriate subclass abilities, something akin to Battlemaster and Cavalier as some have said, but more unique and appropriate to a warlord subclass. Yet, this subclass would have the following addition: The warlord subclass could share its Second Wind, Action Surge, Extra Attack, and Indomitable fighter features with a selected ally or allies within a set range. In the case of Second Wind, Action Surge, and Indomitable Wind, because the way the features are written, these could only be shared with a single ally per round (e.g. A 17th-level fighter who has two action surges could give an action surge to one ally, perhaps a wizard, in one round and the following round could use it him or herself, could share it with the wizard again, or share it with a different ally); yet the Extra Attack feature could be divided among different allies each round. So, an 11th-level fighter warlord who gets 3 attacks/round might forgo an attack action one round and give all three extra attacks to a single character. The next round, the fighter warlord might use one attack and give the remaining 2 attacks to two different allies, the next round, the fighter warlord might forgo an attack and spread the 3 attacks to 3 different allies, the next round the fighter warlord might use all 3 attacks him or herself. I thought that might be a cool and elegant way to use the existing fighter class but do so in an interesting way that really enhances one's allies. I like the idea of the fighter warlord (who has reached 5th level when the fighter gets Extra Attack) distributing extra attacks as he or she directs his comrades using superior tactical knowledge and experience. Also, it would feel way different from the cleric. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should 5e have more classes (Poll and Discussion)?
Top