Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crimson Longinus" data-source="post: 8088051" data-attributes="member: 7025508">Of course it is about preferences and opinions, that's what we're discussing. But I don't think it is at all sensible to say that because you liked 4E version of the warlord whilst I found it a flawed execution that your opinion on what 5E warlord should be would somehow to be more valuable. I want a warlord, I just want it to be a fighter subclass (and there has been some excellent ideas in this thread how to do just that.) And if you liked 4E version that much, it still exists, you can play that version of the game if you want. A lot of people play much older editions too.I have not once mentioned Pathfinder in this thread, and never played either edition of it. I have some knowledge of it, but ultimately I don't care. But again, if you think it is more 'sensible' then perhaps you should play it instead?</blockquote>