Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Should a Lich's phylactery be on the same plane?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="green slime" data-source="post: 1155582" data-attributes="member: 1325"><p>That is alright, Frank. Let me explain.</p><p></p><p>Mayhap, the plan isn't to kill the lich, merely negotiate an agreement...</p><p></p><p>For whatever reasons, it may actually be less difficult to locate the phylactery than the actual lich himself. Anyone has to be aware that when you approach the phylactery, the lich is going to make an effort to divert you. If you have already found it, then you know he is going to make an appearance. Knowing this, you come prepared. The Lich might be willing to negotiate or not, depending on the exact situation. </p><p></p><p>You stated that the lich had a day to prepare for this, due to the slow time trait. Doesn't mean those approaching the phylactery are any less prepared themselves.</p><p></p><p>In 3.0 I can't see that the lich expires upon destruction of the phylactery (which you seem to be implying), unless you have already defeated the lich first. For 3.5, I seem to have malplaced my book. </p><p></p><p>Perhaps I read it incorrectly, but they way I see defeating the Lich:</p><p>1) Destroy its physcial body</p><p>2) Destroy the phylactery</p><p>In that order. So the sheep's eyelash might just matter after all. 'Cause if you destroy the phyactery first, the lich will flee, to create another. </p><p></p><p>I can understand your position if destruction of the box automatically defeats the lich. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I think Lich phylacteries should function akin to <em>magic jar</em> requiring a physical body for them to take over, rather than just spontaneously creating one after 1d10 days. This would leave them being given away as a child's toy, or some such innocous object.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="green slime, post: 1155582, member: 1325"] That is alright, Frank. Let me explain. Mayhap, the plan isn't to kill the lich, merely negotiate an agreement... For whatever reasons, it may actually be less difficult to locate the phylactery than the actual lich himself. Anyone has to be aware that when you approach the phylactery, the lich is going to make an effort to divert you. If you have already found it, then you know he is going to make an appearance. Knowing this, you come prepared. The Lich might be willing to negotiate or not, depending on the exact situation. You stated that the lich had a day to prepare for this, due to the slow time trait. Doesn't mean those approaching the phylactery are any less prepared themselves. In 3.0 I can't see that the lich expires upon destruction of the phylactery (which you seem to be implying), unless you have already defeated the lich first. For 3.5, I seem to have malplaced my book. Perhaps I read it incorrectly, but they way I see defeating the Lich: 1) Destroy its physcial body 2) Destroy the phylactery In that order. So the sheep's eyelash might just matter after all. 'Cause if you destroy the phyactery first, the lich will flee, to create another. I can understand your position if destruction of the box automatically defeats the lich. Personally, I think Lich phylacteries should function akin to [i]magic jar[/i] requiring a physical body for them to take over, rather than just spontaneously creating one after 1d10 days. This would leave them being given away as a child's toy, or some such innocous object. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Should a Lich's phylactery be on the same plane?
Top