Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MNblockhead" data-source="post: 9273469" data-attributes="member: 6796661"><p>When I bought the Warhammer Fantasy Rolepay 4e core book, I really liked having everything in one book...until I really started playing.&nbsp; The bestiary is pretty anemic. Also, reading various discussions and blog posts that included comments from the designers, the bestiary was originally meant to be more of a tool-kit, but because of word count they didn't do a good job explaining that. As published the monster section feels uninspired and confusing and underpowered in many places. But when I read a blog post from one of the developers, it was a real a-ha! moment and it was very cool what they were trying to do--to bad they didn't explain it in the core book.&nbsp; I think the game would have been better served by splitting out the bestiary and fleshing out the mechanics and advice for building and customizing monsters and NPCs and also putting in more art and fluff.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="MNblockhead, post: 9273469, member: 6796661"] When I bought the Warhammer Fantasy Rolepay 4e core book, I really liked having everything in one book...until I really started playing. The bestiary is pretty anemic. Also, reading various discussions and blog posts that included comments from the designers, the bestiary was originally meant to be more of a tool-kit, but because of word count they didn't do a good job explaining that. As published the monster section feels uninspired and confusing and underpowered in many places. But when I read a blog post from one of the developers, it was a real a-ha! moment and it was very cool what they were trying to do--to bad they didn't explain it in the core book. I think the game would have been better served by splitting out the bestiary and fleshing out the mechanics and advice for building and customizing monsters and NPCs and also putting in more art and fluff. [/QUOTE]

Verification