Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should Castles Even Exist?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="A'koss" data-source="post: 1101317" data-attributes="member: 840"><p>Again if your HL demographics allow your kingdom (and/or the opposition) to muster 2 or 3 groups of HL characters, don't bother with the army until you have neutralized the opposition's HL forces first.</p><p> </p><p>I see a lot of people think that just because the defenders have the same number of HLers as the attackers, it all comes out in a wash. In practice however that couldn't be further from the truth... </p><p> </p><p>IOCs, we've run many of these kinds of battles over the years, what you find is that you require many, many more HLers to defend <em>anything</em> than it does to attack a large target like a city or a army for example. And these HLers will have to stick together in groups for the most part or risk becoming easy targets themselves. The attacker has all the advantages - he can attack where he wants, when he wants and in whatever manner he wants. Defensive magic in D&D is way too limited in ability and area to be able to counter these kinds of attacks. With a little stealth, a little coordination and a little intelligence you can make devastating hit and run attacks with little to no fear of reprisal. See my previous example for ideas.</p><p> </p><p>Marching an army and laying seige to your enemy is a cool notion, but the way D&D is geared, particulary with teleportation, flight, invis., endless variety of attack spells, etc. an army is a huge, slow moving, nigh impossible to defend target. An army is simply too weak and too vulnerable unless there are very, very few HLers in the world. And if you're marching an army, you'll require an inordinate number of HLers just to provide even the most meager defense, leaving your cities even more defenseless against the kinds of city attacks I mentioned in an earlier post. The HLers defending the army would have to scramble back to their cities to try and defend them (leaving the army vulnerable) or leave the cities to burn while you're on the march, It's a lose-lose situation. <em>Win the war first, then bring in the army.</em> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p> </p><p>In my new campaign I've been very careful about the levels of magic, monsters, and in particular, a few of the powers that can really be civilization breaking. There is no teleportation, spell-based planeshifting (with the exception of a very few Druid-built gateways), or spell-based flight (but a flying mount is possible). Scrying-style divinations can only be done through a kind of ritualized astral projection (which has dangers of it's own) and there are no greater than 5th-6th level spells period. There is no spell-based polymorphing/shapeshifting, but there are a couple of supernatural PrCs that allow for some limited shapeshifting. That said, you can astrally project through a spell and "possess" an animal which I think is kinda neat. If you're powerful enough you can try and possess another person, which essentially replaces domination in the game. That probably gives you a good enough idea of how I'm weeding out the problem children... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p> </p><p>Cheers,</p><p> </p><p>A'koss.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="A'koss, post: 1101317, member: 840"] Again if your HL demographics allow your kingdom (and/or the opposition) to muster 2 or 3 groups of HL characters, don't bother with the army until you have neutralized the opposition's HL forces first. I see a lot of people think that just because the defenders have the same number of HLers as the attackers, it all comes out in a wash. In practice however that couldn't be further from the truth... IOCs, we've run many of these kinds of battles over the years, what you find is that you require many, many more HLers to defend [i]anything[/i] than it does to attack a large target like a city or a army for example. And these HLers will have to stick together in groups for the most part or risk becoming easy targets themselves. The attacker has all the advantages - he can attack where he wants, when he wants and in whatever manner he wants. Defensive magic in D&D is way too limited in ability and area to be able to counter these kinds of attacks. With a little stealth, a little coordination and a little intelligence you can make devastating hit and run attacks with little to no fear of reprisal. See my previous example for ideas. Marching an army and laying seige to your enemy is a cool notion, but the way D&D is geared, particulary with teleportation, flight, invis., endless variety of attack spells, etc. an army is a huge, slow moving, nigh impossible to defend target. An army is simply too weak and too vulnerable unless there are very, very few HLers in the world. And if you're marching an army, you'll require an inordinate number of HLers just to provide even the most meager defense, leaving your cities even more defenseless against the kinds of city attacks I mentioned in an earlier post. The HLers defending the army would have to scramble back to their cities to try and defend them (leaving the army vulnerable) or leave the cities to burn while you're on the march, It's a lose-lose situation. [i]Win the war first, then bring in the army.[/i] ;) In my new campaign I've been very careful about the levels of magic, monsters, and in particular, a few of the powers that can really be civilization breaking. There is no teleportation, spell-based planeshifting (with the exception of a very few Druid-built gateways), or spell-based flight (but a flying mount is possible). Scrying-style divinations can only be done through a kind of ritualized astral projection (which has dangers of it's own) and there are no greater than 5th-6th level spells period. There is no spell-based polymorphing/shapeshifting, but there are a couple of supernatural PrCs that allow for some limited shapeshifting. That said, you can astrally project through a spell and "possess" an animal which I think is kinda neat. If you're powerful enough you can try and possess another person, which essentially replaces domination in the game. That probably gives you a good enough idea of how I'm weeding out the problem children... :D Cheers, A'koss. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should Castles Even Exist?
Top