Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should D&D be marketed like Coke, Ketchup, or Spaghetti Sauce?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunseeker" data-source="post: 6281653"><p>As a long time MTG player, I have to agree that there is much in 4e that is modeled after the way MTG works, at least in terms of style and design sense. "Attacking" against "Defenses" is certainly straight from the MTG Power/Toughness playbook, as opposed to reacting to attacks with defensive rolls. I really like both options and I feel they each have a place in D&D depending on the attack and the method of defense. I incorporate both in my games.</p><p></p><p>It's not unknown that while the D&D market is shrinking, MTG maintains a strong playerbase, and this is most certainly in part to the fact that there have been few major changes to the rules over the years. New "editions" aren't whole new games, they're new settings. With some irony, Wizards uses the same model with MTG as Paizo does with Pathfinder. Fixed core, and strong adventure support and <em>adding</em> new rules and systems to the game, which only apply when players choose to play a card with the associated rules.</p><p></p><p>I think 4e was trying to <em>be</em> that core on to which the game could expand in non-splat, non-crunch ways. This is an admirable goal. Unfortunately it already had 3+ editions trying to be the same thing to compete with.</p><p></p><p>But D&D isn't a CCG and it can't be sold like one. There's no incentive to buy the latest books like there is to buy the latest cards. You don't even need the official books to play in organized play, while you <em>do</em> need to have the official cards for sanctioned MTG play. The minis <em>tried</em> to fill that "you need to buy it in order to play" gap, but really they simply weren't the same thing. Even if you <em>wanted</em> to play with Minis, there's absolutely no incentive to have the "official" ones, even for sanctioned play. </p><p></p><p>I think there are cues to be taken from MTG. At it's core MTG uses a very simple and streamlined rules system of basic math (it is extremely rare to find multiplication or division in MTG, or any math of a more complicated sort) and a system of "can't trumps can", which as again, a long time MTG player, I find is very easy to comprehend, especially for people new to the game, it is the sort of system that can be laid in place as a foundation for a <em>lot</em> of new rules and systems down the road.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunseeker, post: 6281653"] As a long time MTG player, I have to agree that there is much in 4e that is modeled after the way MTG works, at least in terms of style and design sense. "Attacking" against "Defenses" is certainly straight from the MTG Power/Toughness playbook, as opposed to reacting to attacks with defensive rolls. I really like both options and I feel they each have a place in D&D depending on the attack and the method of defense. I incorporate both in my games. It's not unknown that while the D&D market is shrinking, MTG maintains a strong playerbase, and this is most certainly in part to the fact that there have been few major changes to the rules over the years. New "editions" aren't whole new games, they're new settings. With some irony, Wizards uses the same model with MTG as Paizo does with Pathfinder. Fixed core, and strong adventure support and [I]adding[/I] new rules and systems to the game, which only apply when players choose to play a card with the associated rules. I think 4e was trying to [I]be[/I] that core on to which the game could expand in non-splat, non-crunch ways. This is an admirable goal. Unfortunately it already had 3+ editions trying to be the same thing to compete with. But D&D isn't a CCG and it can't be sold like one. There's no incentive to buy the latest books like there is to buy the latest cards. You don't even need the official books to play in organized play, while you [I]do[/I] need to have the official cards for sanctioned MTG play. The minis [I]tried[/I] to fill that "you need to buy it in order to play" gap, but really they simply weren't the same thing. Even if you [I]wanted[/I] to play with Minis, there's absolutely no incentive to have the "official" ones, even for sanctioned play. I think there are cues to be taken from MTG. At it's core MTG uses a very simple and streamlined rules system of basic math (it is extremely rare to find multiplication or division in MTG, or any math of a more complicated sort) and a system of "can't trumps can", which as again, a long time MTG player, I find is very easy to comprehend, especially for people new to the game, it is the sort of system that can be laid in place as a foundation for a [I]lot[/I] of new rules and systems down the road. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should D&D be marketed like Coke, Ketchup, or Spaghetti Sauce?
Top