Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should D&D go away from ASIs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ratskinner" data-source="post: 7263516" data-attributes="member: 6688937"><p>Well, I'm not opposed to ASIs in the current framework, but I am growing increasingly sceptical of the concept of simulationist-y attributes in general. So I'll take a crack at it.</p><p></p><p>I would propose that the mechanical weight born by the current ability scores be carried instead by class and racial features and a sort of ribbon list to quirk-ify characters. That way, if you want to play a heavy-hitting muscle-mountain of a fighter, you take that tank class and it's baked right in. Have another swashbuckler class for the clever, acrobatic version of fighter, who has his critical abilities baked right in.</p><p></p><p>Similarly, if elves are to be especially graceful, give them an Elven Grace trait and tell me what it does. (Classes would be a smaller and more tightly-defined with fewer internal options than the current system.) That gives an opportunity to make that Elven Grace more impactful than a minor statistical variance from baseline human. (No guarantees on designers using that well.)</p><p></p><p>The quirk list might provide narrower, weaker, or just plain different distinctions. It could even be wrapped into the background idea. </p><p></p><p>However, as much as possible, all of these should avoid having simple mechanical stacking bonuses, especially to combat stats. The Swashbuckler and Manmountain above both have the same basic combat bonuses, but they derive from different narrative sources. (Since we are talking about them as Fighters). The differences become apparent when the Manmountain uses his "Bend Bars/Lift Gates" trait and the Swashbuckler uses his "He's a leaper" ability. Along these lines, I would recommend that the spells also be a descriptor that work within the mechanical confines of the caster class.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my Nexus 7 using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ratskinner, post: 7263516, member: 6688937"] Well, I'm not opposed to ASIs in the current framework, but I am growing increasingly sceptical of the concept of simulationist-y attributes in general. So I'll take a crack at it. I would propose that the mechanical weight born by the current ability scores be carried instead by class and racial features and a sort of ribbon list to quirk-ify characters. That way, if you want to play a heavy-hitting muscle-mountain of a fighter, you take that tank class and it's baked right in. Have another swashbuckler class for the clever, acrobatic version of fighter, who has his critical abilities baked right in. Similarly, if elves are to be especially graceful, give them an Elven Grace trait and tell me what it does. (Classes would be a smaller and more tightly-defined with fewer internal options than the current system.) That gives an opportunity to make that Elven Grace more impactful than a minor statistical variance from baseline human. (No guarantees on designers using that well.) The quirk list might provide narrower, weaker, or just plain different distinctions. It could even be wrapped into the background idea. However, as much as possible, all of these should avoid having simple mechanical stacking bonuses, especially to combat stats. The Swashbuckler and Manmountain above both have the same basic combat bonuses, but they derive from different narrative sources. (Since we are talking about them as Fighters). The differences become apparent when the Manmountain uses his "Bend Bars/Lift Gates" trait and the Swashbuckler uses his "He's a leaper" ability. Along these lines, I would recommend that the spells also be a descriptor that work within the mechanical confines of the caster class. Sent from my Nexus 7 using [URL=http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205]EN World mobile app[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should D&D go away from ASIs?
Top