Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should Dungeon and Polyheadron be in the same magazine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LightPhoenix" data-source="post: 1472886" data-attributes="member: 115"><p>Ah, here we go again. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> </p><p> </p><p>As I recall, when Paizo took over, the option was thus - fold the magazines together or lose them both. They intimated that neither had the readership necessary to sustain printing costs, even at the bimonthly level. Now, if you're a conspiracy theorist, you could say they lied about that. However, they have no reason to lie, because the <em>logical</em> business move is to dump both magazines because they're not making money. Instead they worked to try and keep them both afloat.</p><p> </p><p>As for the rise in printing costs after they said they wouldn't, you know what that says to me? The magazine was <em>still </em>not doing well enough to sustain it's publication. Again, instead of doing the logical thing and just dumping the magazine, they took the necessary steps to keep it afloat, with full knowledge they would upset a percentage, possibly a significant percentage, of their readers.</p><p> </p><p>Finally, let's all keep one <em>very</em> important fact in mind. If you're a member of this community, you are in the <em>minority</em> of role-players out there. Despite what we might like to think, there are more people that <em>don't</em> know about ENWorld than there are people that do. Just visiting this site, let alone being an active member of the community, indicates a level of dedication to the game above and beyond the norm. What this means to me is that we're all more likely to be spending money on stuff like <em>Dungeon/Polyhedron</em> and other peripherals. We're the minority though. Most people are <em>not</em> spending money on <em>D/P</em> in the first place.</p><p> </p><p>Whether you like the magazine or not, Paizo has worked hard to keep <em>Dungeon</em> and <em>Polyhedron</em> alive. Bashing them for the actions <em>they had to take</em> to keep both magazines alive is just petty and short-sighted. If you really want to be constructive and help, get out your pen and paper and write down all the things you think could improve the magazine. Send it to them. No e-mail. Physical snail mail. Then go and pick up the magazine next time you see it on the stands. After all, cancelling your subscription is only furthering the demise of both magazines.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LightPhoenix, post: 1472886, member: 115"] Ah, here we go again. :p As I recall, when Paizo took over, the option was thus - fold the magazines together or lose them both. They intimated that neither had the readership necessary to sustain printing costs, even at the bimonthly level. Now, if you're a conspiracy theorist, you could say they lied about that. However, they have no reason to lie, because the [i]logical[/i] business move is to dump both magazines because they're not making money. Instead they worked to try and keep them both afloat. As for the rise in printing costs after they said they wouldn't, you know what that says to me? The magazine was [i]still [/i]not doing well enough to sustain it's publication. Again, instead of doing the logical thing and just dumping the magazine, they took the necessary steps to keep it afloat, with full knowledge they would upset a percentage, possibly a significant percentage, of their readers. Finally, let's all keep one [i]very[/i] important fact in mind. If you're a member of this community, you are in the [i]minority[/i] of role-players out there. Despite what we might like to think, there are more people that [i]don't[/i] know about ENWorld than there are people that do. Just visiting this site, let alone being an active member of the community, indicates a level of dedication to the game above and beyond the norm. What this means to me is that we're all more likely to be spending money on stuff like [i]Dungeon/Polyhedron[/i] and other peripherals. We're the minority though. Most people are [i]not[/i] spending money on [i]D/P[/i] in the first place. Whether you like the magazine or not, Paizo has worked hard to keep [i]Dungeon[/i] and [i]Polyhedron[/i] alive. Bashing them for the actions [i]they had to take[/i] to keep both magazines alive is just petty and short-sighted. If you really want to be constructive and help, get out your pen and paper and write down all the things you think could improve the magazine. Send it to them. No e-mail. Physical snail mail. Then go and pick up the magazine next time you see it on the stands. After all, cancelling your subscription is only furthering the demise of both magazines. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should Dungeon and Polyheadron be in the same magazine
Top