Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Should each ability scores get it's own table?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yora" data-source="post: 5937077" data-attributes="member: 6670763"><p>I once tried to streamline 2nd Edition and it really turned out that all the differences in the tables are really mostly "fake differences". They were just written down in really weird ways, but put all the bonuses in one place, and all the penalties in another place, and you end up with the basic tables that are really very straightforward.</p><p>Yes, it does look more interesting when you get a +2 to damage and +1 to attack instead of having +1/+1 or +2/+2. But when you go through the tables, you find that the next lines says +3/+2, +4/+3, +5/+4, and so on. It just looks different for the sake of appearing to be different and complex. Either they didn't know any better, or they did it on purpose. Either way, it's bad game design.</p><p></p><p>And when you roll 3d6 for the stats, there's actually only a very small chance that you will have anything but +0 to anything. So in the few cases you actually did get something, there was even less chance that you would feel "it's always the same".</p><p>One table for all abilities is the way to go. That way, you can remember the numbers and don't have to look them up all the time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yora, post: 5937077, member: 6670763"] I once tried to streamline 2nd Edition and it really turned out that all the differences in the tables are really mostly "fake differences". They were just written down in really weird ways, but put all the bonuses in one place, and all the penalties in another place, and you end up with the basic tables that are really very straightforward. Yes, it does look more interesting when you get a +2 to damage and +1 to attack instead of having +1/+1 or +2/+2. But when you go through the tables, you find that the next lines says +3/+2, +4/+3, +5/+4, and so on. It just looks different for the sake of appearing to be different and complex. Either they didn't know any better, or they did it on purpose. Either way, it's bad game design. And when you roll 3d6 for the stats, there's actually only a very small chance that you will have anything but +0 to anything. So in the few cases you actually did get something, there was even less chance that you would feel "it's always the same". One table for all abilities is the way to go. That way, you can remember the numbers and don't have to look them up all the time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Should each ability scores get it's own table?
Top