Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should FLGS have Edition Bias?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brainstorm" data-source="post: 5316983" data-attributes="member: 45712"><p>Just came back from my FLGS where I had an interesting experience. There were some guys in there that were apparently shopping around for a gaming system. I didn't catch the entire conversation, so I may have a few facts wrong, but what I gathered was that they had been 3.5 D&D players at some point and were looking into the current options. The guy in the FLGS that was helping them pretty much went straight for Pathfinder and tried to sell that to them, going into the strengths of the game, the changes they made from 3.5 and how it was such an improvement, yada yada yada. He barely talked about 4E, only mentioning that he'd tried it for a few months and lost interest in running it. I really had to bite my tongue to keep from speaking my mind, and maybe I should have, but it's not my store and really none of my business what they want to push off their shelves. But I thought the whole scene odd, given their stock of 4E material was much larger than their Pathfinder stock. I got the impression that they weren't trying to sell a product, they were trying to sell a version of D&D that they preferred. </p><p> </p><p>Now, I've only played Pathfinder once and didn't really enjoy the experience, not because of the game, but because of the guy running it, so I don't necessarily have anything against Pathfinder. But as a 4E DM, I kinda felt, at that moment, that my FLGS wasn't there for me. </p><p> </p><p>Anyway, taking personal feelings out of the equation, I think that a better approach might have been to discuss the benefits of both systems, ask the customers what they liked about 3.5 and what they were looking for in a current game and then tout the pros/cons of each of the systems. Heck, they carry Dragon Age, Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay and a few other fantasy systems, but none of those were mentioned either. </p><p> </p><p>Anyway, just thought I'd share. Thanks for listening.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brainstorm, post: 5316983, member: 45712"] Just came back from my FLGS where I had an interesting experience. There were some guys in there that were apparently shopping around for a gaming system. I didn't catch the entire conversation, so I may have a few facts wrong, but what I gathered was that they had been 3.5 D&D players at some point and were looking into the current options. The guy in the FLGS that was helping them pretty much went straight for Pathfinder and tried to sell that to them, going into the strengths of the game, the changes they made from 3.5 and how it was such an improvement, yada yada yada. He barely talked about 4E, only mentioning that he'd tried it for a few months and lost interest in running it. I really had to bite my tongue to keep from speaking my mind, and maybe I should have, but it's not my store and really none of my business what they want to push off their shelves. But I thought the whole scene odd, given their stock of 4E material was much larger than their Pathfinder stock. I got the impression that they weren't trying to sell a product, they were trying to sell a version of D&D that they preferred. Now, I've only played Pathfinder once and didn't really enjoy the experience, not because of the game, but because of the guy running it, so I don't necessarily have anything against Pathfinder. But as a 4E DM, I kinda felt, at that moment, that my FLGS wasn't there for me. Anyway, taking personal feelings out of the equation, I think that a better approach might have been to discuss the benefits of both systems, ask the customers what they liked about 3.5 and what they were looking for in a current game and then tout the pros/cons of each of the systems. Heck, they carry Dragon Age, Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay and a few other fantasy systems, but none of those were mentioned either. Anyway, just thought I'd share. Thanks for listening. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should FLGS have Edition Bias?
Top