Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ezo" data-source="post: 9510087" data-attributes="member: 7037866">I'm going by what people like [USER=7035894]@Clint_L[/USER] and others have posted about them here and on other boards. And reading the class in the book makes it pretty clear IMO.Agree completely!Given your POV it seems like anyone NOT playing a full caster would feel any class inferior to fullcasters?&nbsp; <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷‍♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging&nbsp; &nbsp; :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />I don't think it was started in bad faith. I think the OP was hoping the concensus would go more their direction and is surprised it hasn't. I know I've had threads like that that I've started. At some point, you just accept your view is quite as universal as you thought it was and move on.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ezo, post: 9510087, member: 7037866"] I'm going by what people like [USER=7035894]@Clint_L[/USER] and others have posted about them here and on other boards. And reading the class in the book makes it pretty clear IMO. Agree completely! Given your POV it seems like anyone NOT playing a full caster would feel any class inferior to fullcasters? 🤷‍♂️ I don't think it was started in bad faith. I think the OP was hoping the concensus would go more their direction and is surprised it hasn't. I know I've had threads like that that I've started. At some point, you just accept your view is quite as universal as you thought it was and move on. [/QUOTE]

Verification