Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should full casters and Monks have one weapon mastery?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 9511382" data-attributes="member: 6750235"><p>I thought this was in reference to valor bards and this looks like moving the goal post. I don't think you've demonstrated why sorcerers need weapon mastery at all or cleave in particular, but the sorcerer needs the martial weapon training feat before 9th level and can use a training area in their bastion to gain the weapon mastery trait of a great axe for cleave with the empower option.</p><p></p><p>This costs one feat and downtime before the adventure.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>These classes don't need cleave and giving them a free weapon mastery doesn't change their weapon proficiencies. You're incorrect though.</p><p></p><p>A druid with the warden primal order has proficiency in martial weapons and can take the weapon mastery feat at 4th level for cleave.</p><p></p><p>A warlock with pact of the blade is proficient in that weapon, which can be a battle axe, to qualify for the weapon master feat.</p><p></p><p>Any of them can take the martial weapon training feat and then the weapon master feat for +2 worth of ability score increase and that weapon mastery.</p><p></p><p>Cleave is still moving the goal post from weapon mastery to specific weapon mastery. Any of them can spend one feat for weapon mastery within their weapon proficiencies.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's nothing wrong with that. Just because a martial class has an option doesn't mean a full caster needs the same option. Full casters have plenty of options not available to martial characters. Using that option removes extra attack for most of them, though, so the desire to give free stuff to casters in order to match an unlikely option for martials makes even less sense.</p><p></p><p>It's also something you're incorrect about. Rogues cannot cleave either. Weapon mastery isn't weapon proficiency.</p><p></p><p>Several spellcasters can take the weapon mastery feat and also apply it to green-flame blade, however.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They weren't wrong. Cleave attacks a second target in the attack and green-flame blade damages a second target in the attack. Green-flame blade is better, however, because it doesn't require a second attack roll and typically does more damage unless the cleave can stack some bonus damage on the attack.</p><p></p><p>Vicious mockery also replicates sap. Ray of frost replicates slow. Thorn whip does pull instead of push.</p><p></p><p>Weapon masteries don't replicate chill touch preventing healing or mind sliver inflicting a save penalty, or many other cantrip options.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Only if you push the goal posts cherry picking cleave because of weapon proficiencies. But I did demonstrate otherwise above.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hard disagree. Weapon mastery is a martial trait with no good reason to give it to full casters other than your desire for it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which is meaningless outside of that comparison. Just because it's harder to do something EK's can do easily isn't a reason to give that ability to everyone else.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's like saying all martials should cast wish because wizards can and fighters can't. Just because something exists doesn't make you entitled to it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hard disagree. It becomes less fun for players who see their toys being given away. It's the whole basis for protecting iconic spells for spellcasters. That same protection goes the other way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 9511382, member: 6750235"] I thought this was in reference to valor bards and this looks like moving the goal post. I don't think you've demonstrated why sorcerers need weapon mastery at all or cleave in particular, but the sorcerer needs the martial weapon training feat before 9th level and can use a training area in their bastion to gain the weapon mastery trait of a great axe for cleave with the empower option. This costs one feat and downtime before the adventure. These classes don't need cleave and giving them a free weapon mastery doesn't change their weapon proficiencies. You're incorrect though. A druid with the warden primal order has proficiency in martial weapons and can take the weapon mastery feat at 4th level for cleave. A warlock with pact of the blade is proficient in that weapon, which can be a battle axe, to qualify for the weapon master feat. Any of them can take the martial weapon training feat and then the weapon master feat for +2 worth of ability score increase and that weapon mastery. Cleave is still moving the goal post from weapon mastery to specific weapon mastery. Any of them can spend one feat for weapon mastery within their weapon proficiencies. There's nothing wrong with that. Just because a martial class has an option doesn't mean a full caster needs the same option. Full casters have plenty of options not available to martial characters. Using that option removes extra attack for most of them, though, so the desire to give free stuff to casters in order to match an unlikely option for martials makes even less sense. It's also something you're incorrect about. Rogues cannot cleave either. Weapon mastery isn't weapon proficiency. Several spellcasters can take the weapon mastery feat and also apply it to green-flame blade, however. They weren't wrong. Cleave attacks a second target in the attack and green-flame blade damages a second target in the attack. Green-flame blade is better, however, because it doesn't require a second attack roll and typically does more damage unless the cleave can stack some bonus damage on the attack. Vicious mockery also replicates sap. Ray of frost replicates slow. Thorn whip does pull instead of push. Weapon masteries don't replicate chill touch preventing healing or mind sliver inflicting a save penalty, or many other cantrip options. Only if you push the goal posts cherry picking cleave because of weapon proficiencies. But I did demonstrate otherwise above. Hard disagree. Weapon mastery is a martial trait with no good reason to give it to full casters other than your desire for it. Which is meaningless outside of that comparison. Just because it's harder to do something EK's can do easily isn't a reason to give that ability to everyone else. That's like saying all martials should cast wish because wizards can and fighters can't. Just because something exists doesn't make you entitled to it. Hard disagree. It becomes less fun for players who see their toys being given away. It's the whole basis for protecting iconic spells for spellcasters. That same protection goes the other way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should full casters and Monks have one weapon mastery?
Top