Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should healing magic be based on HD or not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8492613" data-attributes="member: 7032025"><p>You are aware of nothing, since you are obviously so misguided. I don't have any specific antipathy for 4e, I'm just actually annoyed at people still trying to push it through in every single instance of a conversation like it's the one true solution to every single RPG problem ever. Apart from that, on its own, it's a great game that I enjoyed for a few years, it's just that it does not correspond at all to the way I played D&D before and to my expectations of the game in general, and as soon as an alternative appeared that much better corresponded to my expectations, I switched over and never looked back. It's a matter of personal taste, I won't criticise yours if you don't criticise mine. And while I'm honestly amongst the first people to recognise a number of 4e qualities, I'm really, really, REALLY annoyed by 4e fanboys and their attitude, their defensiveness and their desperate need to show that it was actually not that bad and did not deserve the treatment that it received.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>On the one hand, you're right, fragility is not the only criterion, I should have added the intrinsic power (due to abilities) but from my perspective the rating is about the same. And I won't comment about very small deviations in the rating, if really pushed, I would probably say that because there are no deviations, BECMI is probably even more "zero" than AD&D, but the difference is minute.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In a sense, it shows that I was right about the rating since apparently you don't even know what it means. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>After that, well just have a look at the type of adventures published for the various editions and how they are supposed to be carried out by the adventurers and you will very quickly see the difference. But yes, becoming actual heroes, with corresponding powers to influence the universe (and not just a few squares of a grid), actual demigods and potentially gods is part of the journey, at least the way I see it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As the ratings start with "my view", I don't think that anyone would claim that it was anything but subjective. I will cut up the rest, since you descending into borderline insult just goes to show how short of actual arguments you actually are. Please don't start another edition war, as usual, it comes from 4e fanboys trying to push their views and not allowing for any different view.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8492613, member: 7032025"] You are aware of nothing, since you are obviously so misguided. I don't have any specific antipathy for 4e, I'm just actually annoyed at people still trying to push it through in every single instance of a conversation like it's the one true solution to every single RPG problem ever. Apart from that, on its own, it's a great game that I enjoyed for a few years, it's just that it does not correspond at all to the way I played D&D before and to my expectations of the game in general, and as soon as an alternative appeared that much better corresponded to my expectations, I switched over and never looked back. It's a matter of personal taste, I won't criticise yours if you don't criticise mine. And while I'm honestly amongst the first people to recognise a number of 4e qualities, I'm really, really, REALLY annoyed by 4e fanboys and their attitude, their defensiveness and their desperate need to show that it was actually not that bad and did not deserve the treatment that it received. On the one hand, you're right, fragility is not the only criterion, I should have added the intrinsic power (due to abilities) but from my perspective the rating is about the same. And I won't comment about very small deviations in the rating, if really pushed, I would probably say that because there are no deviations, BECMI is probably even more "zero" than AD&D, but the difference is minute. In a sense, it shows that I was right about the rating since apparently you don't even know what it means. :p After that, well just have a look at the type of adventures published for the various editions and how they are supposed to be carried out by the adventurers and you will very quickly see the difference. But yes, becoming actual heroes, with corresponding powers to influence the universe (and not just a few squares of a grid), actual demigods and potentially gods is part of the journey, at least the way I see it. As the ratings start with "my view", I don't think that anyone would claim that it was anything but subjective. I will cut up the rest, since you descending into borderline insult just goes to show how short of actual arguments you actually are. Please don't start another edition war, as usual, it comes from 4e fanboys trying to push their views and not allowing for any different view. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should healing magic be based on HD or not?
Top