Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Should movies just not explain the science?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bullgrit" data-source="post: 6180159" data-attributes="member: 31216"><p>For instance: superhero movies</p><p></p><p>We know that when we go to a superhero movie, there will be fantasitical things, and we should enter fully willing to suspend our disbelief. And I usually can. But then, sometimes, for some usually unnecessary reason, the writers feel the need for a character to explain the "science." And they usually get it hilariously wrong.</p><p></p><p>It's not just superhero movies, either. Pretty much any sci-fi-type movie has this problem. A space ship travels a far distance, and we're all capable of accepting that idea. But then they say the distance is X light years and the ship's engineer explains to a new recruit how they travel faster than light.</p><p></p><p>The villain mastermind is a super genius, and really, we get that. But then a psychiatrist mentions how the villain uses a full 90% of his brain versus the usual 10% of a normal person.</p><p></p><p>There is a code for using the space teleporter, and ok. But then someone specifies that there are six numbers in the code, and a scientist says that's because to identify a point in space requires six coordinates.</p><p></p><p>Etc.</p><p></p><p>It seems that just about every time a sci-fi movie character has explained the science of the fiction, he/she gets it stupidly wrong. And most of the time we, the viewer, don't really need any explanation. We've already bought into the idea that sci-fi things will happen; they have us in the audience. Throwing in an unnecessary *and wrong* explanation just seems very foolish. People who have at least a high school level science understanding get, at least, jolted out of the experience for a moment, or at worst get kicked out of enjoying the whole show.</p><p></p><p>Should movies just not explain the science of the sci-fi universe at all? If a movie does require an explanation of the science, how hard is it really for a writer to look up the facts, or maybe ask a scientist?</p><p></p><p>What are some of the worst examples of bad and unnecessary science explanations in Hollywood movies?</p><p></p><p>Bullgrit</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bullgrit, post: 6180159, member: 31216"] For instance: superhero movies We know that when we go to a superhero movie, there will be fantasitical things, and we should enter fully willing to suspend our disbelief. And I usually can. But then, sometimes, for some usually unnecessary reason, the writers feel the need for a character to explain the "science." And they usually get it hilariously wrong. It's not just superhero movies, either. Pretty much any sci-fi-type movie has this problem. A space ship travels a far distance, and we're all capable of accepting that idea. But then they say the distance is X light years and the ship's engineer explains to a new recruit how they travel faster than light. The villain mastermind is a super genius, and really, we get that. But then a psychiatrist mentions how the villain uses a full 90% of his brain versus the usual 10% of a normal person. There is a code for using the space teleporter, and ok. But then someone specifies that there are six numbers in the code, and a scientist says that's because to identify a point in space requires six coordinates. Etc. It seems that just about every time a sci-fi movie character has explained the science of the fiction, he/she gets it stupidly wrong. And most of the time we, the viewer, don't really need any explanation. We've already bought into the idea that sci-fi things will happen; they have us in the audience. Throwing in an unnecessary *and wrong* explanation just seems very foolish. People who have at least a high school level science understanding get, at least, jolted out of the experience for a moment, or at worst get kicked out of enjoying the whole show. Should movies just not explain the science of the sci-fi universe at all? If a movie does require an explanation of the science, how hard is it really for a writer to look up the facts, or maybe ask a scientist? What are some of the worst examples of bad and unnecessary science explanations in Hollywood movies? Bullgrit [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Should movies just not explain the science?
Top