Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should PCs be forced to act a certain way because of their stats?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 5751233" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>This I totally agree with. There's nothing saying that every character you play has to be great at what he does. Of course not.</p><p></p><p>And, yes, if the character tries to do something, and he's spent the character resources to let him succeed from time to time, GREAT. No harm no foul.</p><p></p><p>Let's stick with 3.5 D&D for a second. To use diplomacy to change someone's reaction from hostile to indifferent is DC 25 by RAW. Now, a 10 Cha, no ranks in diplomacy character can never succeed at that without some form of outside help (Aid Another perhaps, spells, whatever). But, by himself, he will never, ever succeed.</p><p></p><p>So, sure, you could try all you like. But, you're never going to succeed. So long as the player understands this and plays that, I'm perfectly happy.</p><p></p><p>My issue comes when the player gives the good talky and the DM starts ignoring the mechanics and giving auto-successes based on how well the player talks. The Low Cha, No Skills guy tries to stop a fight and succeeds when, by the rules, he never, ever should. </p><p></p><p>How is that making the stats matter?</p><p></p><p>In your example, TheShaman, the stats inform play. Hubert spends the character resources to be the best ninja he can be. So, while he's not better than the best ninja, he's still a ninja and will succeed some of the time. The cowardly marshal plays that fact - his hands shake, he acts a particular way (a bully for example) because of that Cowardly stat.</p><p></p><p>FANTASTIC. I would watch either character in play, pick up the character sheet and there would be no surprises. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, what do you do if the player disagrees? If the player didn't leave it up to you and insisted that he actually was LG?</p><p></p><p>Me, I just kinda ignored it to be honest. CN wasn't something that was going to be a problem in the game and I just didn't bother. But, good and evil comes up a LOT more in the game. Lots of effects trigger off of these alignments. </p><p></p><p>Do you over rule the player or not? And, if you do, isn't this forcing players to play a certain way? </p><p></p><p>IMO, if it's reached this point, there's been a failure already. This should have been discussed LONG before this point. Once it's gotten to the point where there is radical disagreement over interpretation, it's going to be a tangled mess to sort out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 5751233, member: 22779"] This I totally agree with. There's nothing saying that every character you play has to be great at what he does. Of course not. And, yes, if the character tries to do something, and he's spent the character resources to let him succeed from time to time, GREAT. No harm no foul. Let's stick with 3.5 D&D for a second. To use diplomacy to change someone's reaction from hostile to indifferent is DC 25 by RAW. Now, a 10 Cha, no ranks in diplomacy character can never succeed at that without some form of outside help (Aid Another perhaps, spells, whatever). But, by himself, he will never, ever succeed. So, sure, you could try all you like. But, you're never going to succeed. So long as the player understands this and plays that, I'm perfectly happy. My issue comes when the player gives the good talky and the DM starts ignoring the mechanics and giving auto-successes based on how well the player talks. The Low Cha, No Skills guy tries to stop a fight and succeeds when, by the rules, he never, ever should. How is that making the stats matter? In your example, TheShaman, the stats inform play. Hubert spends the character resources to be the best ninja he can be. So, while he's not better than the best ninja, he's still a ninja and will succeed some of the time. The cowardly marshal plays that fact - his hands shake, he acts a particular way (a bully for example) because of that Cowardly stat. FANTASTIC. I would watch either character in play, pick up the character sheet and there would be no surprises. Now, what do you do if the player disagrees? If the player didn't leave it up to you and insisted that he actually was LG? Me, I just kinda ignored it to be honest. CN wasn't something that was going to be a problem in the game and I just didn't bother. But, good and evil comes up a LOT more in the game. Lots of effects trigger off of these alignments. Do you over rule the player or not? And, if you do, isn't this forcing players to play a certain way? IMO, if it's reached this point, there's been a failure already. This should have been discussed LONG before this point. Once it's gotten to the point where there is radical disagreement over interpretation, it's going to be a tangled mess to sort out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should PCs be forced to act a certain way because of their stats?
Top