Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bill Zebub" data-source="post: 8829923" data-attributes="member: 7031982">Yes, it's 100% reciprocal.&nbsp; What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right?If I try to persuade/intimidate/deceive one of your NPCs, you should first determine if I succeed or fail automatically.&nbsp; If the outcome is uncertain, you should ask me to make some kind of roll.Similarly, if one of your NPCs tries to persuade/intimidate/deceive my character, I will first determine whether it automatically succeeds or fails.&nbsp; Maybe I should repeat that: I will first decide whether it automatically succeeds or fails.You weren't talking about making it asymmetric, were you, where the DM both gets to describe goal and approach for an NPC and decide that it's uncertain and set the DC for the PC target?&nbsp; If so, I guess I'll go take a bio break while you play D&amp;D with yourself because I'm apparently extraneous.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bill Zebub, post: 8829923, member: 7031982"] Yes, it's 100% reciprocal. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right? If I try to persuade/intimidate/deceive one of your NPCs, you should first determine if I succeed or fail automatically. If the outcome is uncertain, you should ask me to make some kind of roll. Similarly, if one of your NPCs tries to persuade/intimidate/deceive my character, I will first determine whether it automatically succeeds or fails. Maybe I should repeat that: I will first decide whether it automatically succeeds or fails. You weren't talking about making it asymmetric, were you, where the DM both gets to describe goal and approach for an NPC [I]and[/I] decide that it's uncertain and set the DC for the PC target? If so, I guess I'll go take a bio break while you play D&D with yourself because I'm apparently extraneous. [/QUOTE]

Verification