Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="the shmoopie" data-source="post: 3239077" data-attributes="member: 47832">I voted no.&nbsp; I think that the prestige classes should not be any better, nor any worse than the base classes.&nbsp; The PHB stated that the fighter should be the ultimate martial class, and I think that is awesome.&nbsp; Someone who takes fighter for 20+ lvls should have the most hulking beast on earth, someone who takes a prestige after six or seven lvls should not be as martially strong as the fighter, but should instead gain something new for the &quot;loss&quot; of raw strength.However, I do not think that the prestige class should limit a player either.&nbsp; If I am giving up BAB or a bonus feat, or even extra HP I want that loss to go towards something better, more focused on what I had envisioned my PC to be.&nbsp; I feel prestige classes should focus the PC, honing them down into something very specific, not give them more options then the generic classes, they are generic for a reason.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="the shmoopie, post: 3239077, member: 47832"] I voted no. I think that the prestige classes should not be any better, nor any worse than the base classes. The PHB stated that the fighter should be the ultimate martial class, and I think that is awesome. Someone who takes fighter for 20+ lvls should have the most hulking beast on earth, someone who takes a prestige after six or seven lvls should not be as martially strong as the fighter, but should instead gain something new for the "loss" of raw strength. However, I do not think that the prestige class should limit a player either. If I am giving up BAB or a bonus feat, or even extra HP I want that loss to go towards something better, more focused on what I had envisioned my PC to be. I feel prestige classes should focus the PC, honing them down into something very specific, not give them more options then the generic classes, they are generic for a reason. [/QUOTE]

Verification