Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 9403104" data-attributes="member: 63508">Outdoorsmanship.One of the part people forget is most of these iconic rangers live in low magic worlds were a wolf or bear could fight all possible threat.D&amp;D is high magicOnce you have to deal with vampires, werewolves, liches, demons, and dragons, the idea of an@ unarmored unarmed wolf fighting a Greater Fiend or Adult Dragon without magical support is kinda stupid.Part of the ranger science is either teaching the companion to wear armor/weapon or casting spells on it.This is also where the ranger pet class falls apart.You need magic to keep your beast up to level.But a ranger with good weapon use, skill use, spell use, and a whole companion is broken.4e was right and made the shaman the pet class why cutting their weapons, skills, and offensive spells to boost the companion. The 4e beastmaster has to sacrifice their actions to the beast for it to act.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Minigiant, post: 9403104, member: 63508"] Outdoorsmanship. One of the part people forget is most of these iconic rangers live in low magic worlds were a wolf or bear could fight all possible threat. D&D is high magic Once you have to deal with vampires, werewolves, liches, demons, and dragons, the idea of [B]an@ unarmored unarmed wolf fighting a Greater Fiend or Adult Dragon without magical support is kinda stupid.[/B] Part of the ranger science is either teaching the companion to wear armor/weapon or casting spells on it. This is also where the ranger pet class falls apart. You need magic to keep your beast up to level. But a ranger with good weapon use, skill use, spell use, and a [B]whole[/B] companion is broken. 4e was right and[B] made the shaman the pet class[/B] why cutting their weapons, skills, and offensive spells to boost the companion. The 4e beastmaster has to [B]sacrifice their actions[/B] to the beast for it to act. [/QUOTE]

Verification