Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nahat Anoj" data-source="post: 4947106" data-attributes="member: 25075">It depends on the situation, but I'd say that the wizard is a tempting target for most monsters.&nbsp; In my opinion, the damage output between a striker and a controller - while noticeable - isn't all that vast, particularly if you have a damage-oriented controller.&nbsp; So I think the wizard is still putting out decent damage.&nbsp; If I were a monster and had to choose between taking out a target with decent damage but low defenses/hp (like a controller) or a target&nbsp; with a bit better damage and slightly higher defenses/hp (like a striker), I might choose the former target.&nbsp; I have a greater chance of taking him - and his respectable damage output - out of the picture first, allowing me to focus on the striker.And it's not like the wizard doesn't do things other than damage.&nbsp; If the monsters ignore the wizard, the wizard's control effects can make life miserable for the enemy.&nbsp; The monsters would be taking longer to whittle down the striker, letting the other characters get some extra shots in.&nbsp; Also, a steady trickle of AoE damage is nothing to sneeze at <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp; .</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nahat Anoj, post: 4947106, member: 25075"] It depends on the situation, but I'd say that the wizard is a tempting target for most monsters. In my opinion, the damage output between a striker and a controller - while noticeable - isn't all that vast, particularly if you have a damage-oriented controller. So I think the wizard is still putting out decent damage. If I were a monster and had to choose between taking out a target with decent damage but low defenses/hp (like a controller) or a target with a bit better damage and slightly higher defenses/hp (like a striker), I might choose the former target. I have a greater chance of taking him - and his respectable damage output - out of the picture first, allowing me to focus on the striker. And it's not like the wizard doesn't do things other than damage. If the monsters ignore the wizard, the wizard's control effects can make life miserable for the enemy. The monsters would be taking longer to whittle down the striker, letting the other characters get some extra shots in. Also, a steady trickle of AoE damage is nothing to sneeze at :) . [/QUOTE]

Verification