Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should strong players have an advantage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 5745087" data-attributes="member: 54877"><p>I think there is a reason why charisma is often the first ability that provokes this discussion. There are two separate things here, but in these discussions they often get conflated:</p><p> </p><p>1. The player using his imagination, creativity, etc. to arrive at a good plan or what have you--then try to execute that plan with the character abilities.</p><p> </p><p>2. The player falling back on his native raw ability to trump his character abilities.</p><p> </p><p>Now, it is seldom that clear cut in practice (mainly because it would be so transparent). But visualize a player confronted with the need for the party to sneak into a hostile town. Assume his character isn't particularly strong in any mental stats, but isn't awful in all of them. It isn't unreasonable to suggest disguises, posing as pilgrims, merchants, etc. Or more risky, they waylay a messenger and take his place. Or any number of such things, depending upon their exact situation. Then the party tries it. Fine. There are some inherent advantages or disadvantages in the situation based on what they do. If they go the disguise route, and pick something that is common in the town, and easy to fake, then they get situational bonuses. These are appropropriate insights for characters with a modicum of mental ability.</p><p> </p><p>But what I hear usually when the charismatic guy wanted a big bonus was that this party waltzes up to guards, with no thought or preparation, pulls his hood over his head, and the <strong>player</strong> start talking like said pilgrim, and expects to fasttalk as if he were the next coming of Obi Wan, complete with hand motions. </p><p> </p><p>I doubt anyone has any problem with the former. The latter, while not "bad wrong fun," is definitely something I don't want to waste my time on.</p><p> </p><p>I like clever, insightful, and imaginative play that changes the situation and then the characters deal with the situation as it now is. This to me is the heart of play. I don't like <strong>players</strong> fast talking their <strong>characters</strong> out of problems, and I don't much care for the "too clever by half" equivalents for intelligence or wisdom, either. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 5745087, member: 54877"] I think there is a reason why charisma is often the first ability that provokes this discussion. There are two separate things here, but in these discussions they often get conflated: 1. The player using his imagination, creativity, etc. to arrive at a good plan or what have you--then try to execute that plan with the character abilities. 2. The player falling back on his native raw ability to trump his character abilities. Now, it is seldom that clear cut in practice (mainly because it would be so transparent). But visualize a player confronted with the need for the party to sneak into a hostile town. Assume his character isn't particularly strong in any mental stats, but isn't awful in all of them. It isn't unreasonable to suggest disguises, posing as pilgrims, merchants, etc. Or more risky, they waylay a messenger and take his place. Or any number of such things, depending upon their exact situation. Then the party tries it. Fine. There are some inherent advantages or disadvantages in the situation based on what they do. If they go the disguise route, and pick something that is common in the town, and easy to fake, then they get situational bonuses. These are appropropriate insights for characters with a modicum of mental ability. But what I hear usually when the charismatic guy wanted a big bonus was that this party waltzes up to guards, with no thought or preparation, pulls his hood over his head, and the [B]player[/B] start talking like said pilgrim, and expects to fasttalk as if he were the next coming of Obi Wan, complete with hand motions. I doubt anyone has any problem with the former. The latter, while not "bad wrong fun," is definitely something I don't want to waste my time on. I like clever, insightful, and imaginative play that changes the situation and then the characters deal with the situation as it now is. This to me is the heart of play. I don't like [B]players[/B] fast talking their [B]characters[/B] out of problems, and I don't much care for the "too clever by half" equivalents for intelligence or wisdom, either. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should strong players have an advantage?
Top