Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should strong players have an advantage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Janx" data-source="post: 5746108" data-attributes="member: 8835"><p>Let's say that a year ago, I would have agreed with you. That a 10 CHA character doesn't try to be Face.</p><p></p><p>Reconsideration of the topic and the factors involved and the people I've known and met contradict that.</p><p></p><p>a) i've already stated in the other thread that real-world skill bleed-over is hard to block (talk player is more likely to be a talky PC).</p><p></p><p>b) just because somebody THINKS they are good at something doesn't mean they are. In fact studies have shown an inverse relationship. Ignorant people think more highly of their ability (when they actually suck), and vice versa. So you're 6 CHA PC is MORE likely to be trying to act all suave and stuff and always be turning others off (and not know why).</p><p></p><p>c) since D&D is interfacing verbally with your GM, your GM still gets to apply your stat to the actual outcome. Your stat is the final gate-keeper to success. This models how real people behave in ways that they TRY to impress or ways that they play it down and the former can fail at it because of charisma they lack, the latter succeeds because they are very charismatic.</p><p></p><p>d) 10 CHA is not so awful that you can't attempt to be charming. We all do it and eventually we all get laid. You might strike out a lot however... 10.5 is the statistical average and it would be disingenuous to assume it means we are all uncouth spazzes who could never convince anybody of anytng like buying our car in the driveway. higher levels of CHA are what get you elected to political office or get a following for your band or cult.</p><p></p><p>e) Real smart people do dumb things like get addicted to coke and become coke-whores (true story). The number on the sheet does have mechanical impact on abilities in the game. However, that doesn't mean that in all things they make smart choices. Just like in real life. Vice versa, there are dumb people who manage to not make any fatal mistakes and pay their rent, etc. They still suck at math and such.</p><p></p><p>f) D&D is a game for smart people, by smart people. A large part of playing it is learning strategic knowledge and applying it to subsequent characters. As such, the player only makes a mistake once. Subsequent PCs never make certain mistakes. Nobody wants to play old school and roll up a 4INT PC and be forced to play him so stupid he gets the party killed. So there has always been some bleed-over of the real-world player into the PC. We are not fully acting AS our PC as written, though we may try to.</p><p></p><p>anyway, that be a summation of reasons I see. And by all means, I play my lower CHA half-orc Barbarian as much less verbal and nuanced than my other PCs with higher charisma.</p><p></p><p>I simply see that there can be other ways to interpret the stat as compared to the player's behavior.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Janx, post: 5746108, member: 8835"] Let's say that a year ago, I would have agreed with you. That a 10 CHA character doesn't try to be Face. Reconsideration of the topic and the factors involved and the people I've known and met contradict that. a) i've already stated in the other thread that real-world skill bleed-over is hard to block (talk player is more likely to be a talky PC). b) just because somebody THINKS they are good at something doesn't mean they are. In fact studies have shown an inverse relationship. Ignorant people think more highly of their ability (when they actually suck), and vice versa. So you're 6 CHA PC is MORE likely to be trying to act all suave and stuff and always be turning others off (and not know why). c) since D&D is interfacing verbally with your GM, your GM still gets to apply your stat to the actual outcome. Your stat is the final gate-keeper to success. This models how real people behave in ways that they TRY to impress or ways that they play it down and the former can fail at it because of charisma they lack, the latter succeeds because they are very charismatic. d) 10 CHA is not so awful that you can't attempt to be charming. We all do it and eventually we all get laid. You might strike out a lot however... 10.5 is the statistical average and it would be disingenuous to assume it means we are all uncouth spazzes who could never convince anybody of anytng like buying our car in the driveway. higher levels of CHA are what get you elected to political office or get a following for your band or cult. e) Real smart people do dumb things like get addicted to coke and become coke-whores (true story). The number on the sheet does have mechanical impact on abilities in the game. However, that doesn't mean that in all things they make smart choices. Just like in real life. Vice versa, there are dumb people who manage to not make any fatal mistakes and pay their rent, etc. They still suck at math and such. f) D&D is a game for smart people, by smart people. A large part of playing it is learning strategic knowledge and applying it to subsequent characters. As such, the player only makes a mistake once. Subsequent PCs never make certain mistakes. Nobody wants to play old school and roll up a 4INT PC and be forced to play him so stupid he gets the party killed. So there has always been some bleed-over of the real-world player into the PC. We are not fully acting AS our PC as written, though we may try to. anyway, that be a summation of reasons I see. And by all means, I play my lower CHA half-orc Barbarian as much less verbal and nuanced than my other PCs with higher charisma. I simply see that there can be other ways to interpret the stat as compared to the player's behavior. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should strong players have an advantage?
Top