Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should strong players have an advantage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5748148" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>I imagine players educated as metallurgists and experts in medieval combat and 16th-century English Lit are frustrated that they can't apply that knowledge, too. </p><p></p><p>But they can't, because the essence of playing a role is pretending that you are that character, and that means that if the character can't figure out the puzzle, you don't get to figure out the puzzle.</p><p></p><p>Well, that's speaking too harshly. Say you're an INT 3 Barbarian who couldn't solve a riddle for beans, but we're playing a table with Jeff, who is playing an INT 20 Wizard. But <em>Jeff</em> can't solve a riddle for beans. If you figure out the riddle, and Jeff rolls a success, you as a player solve the riddle, even if the words you say are temporarily coming out of the mouth of Jeff's Wizard.</p><p></p><p>So <em>you</em> can figure out the riddle, but your character cannot. Jeff can't figure out the riddle, but Jeff's character can. </p><p></p><p>Of course, if Jeff's roll was low and Jeff's Character can't solve the riddle, and no one else can either, it doesn't matter if you personally know the answer or not. Your characters do not. </p><p></p><p>Y'know, in a horror movie, when you're watching from the monster's perspective as it advances on the vulnerable young ditz out wandering in the spooky forest, no matter how loud you yell, "TURN AROUND, DON'T GO IN THAT ABANDONED MILL, CALL THE COPS," it doesn't matter. The character doesn't do those things. It's not in her character to do them. It doesn't matter if you personally would avoid getting chopped to bits in an abandoned mill -- the character does not. That makes a good horror movie -- it builds tension, it creates its own artificial reality, it keeps things dramatic and interesting. </p><p></p><p>That kind of in-character consistency is more important in my games than how particularly good Bill is at solving riddles. For me, it's a role-playing game, not a riddle-solving game. Riddle-solving games can be fun, but they are a different kind of game -- one that specifically doesn't involve pretending to be a magical elf if you want to play it. You don't have to worry if Bill's Character would know the answer, because Bill doesn't have a character, it's just Bill. </p><p></p><p>Not that I'd take your style from you, of course. You don't play with such a wall between what you know and what your character knows, that's fine. Whatever makes the game fun for you, y'know? It just would ruin <em>my</em> fun, which comes much more from the imagination and creativity and unexpected chaos that comes from being in-character. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, sorry about the lack of clarity. To be more specific, the situation would be like this.</p><p></p><p>The party meets the Sphinx, who threatens to eat them if they can't answer her riddle, so she asks it. </p><p></p><p>Now, let's say that Tupac and Biggie already know the answer. But Easy E and ODB do not. Players will likely talk out of character for a while, and everyone knowing the answer (or knowing that Tupac and Biggie know) is pretty inevitable. </p><p></p><p>But their <em>characters</em> still haven't given the correct answer. Their characters try to answer the riddle, but fail their INT checks (or whatever). So regardless Tupac and Biggie (and possibly all the players) already knowing the answer, nobody's characters know the answer. The Sphinx sighs and eats them.</p><p></p><p>Later, perhaps now with characters that have a robust INT score, Tupac, Biggie, Easy E, and ODB encounter the Sphinx again, and she asks a different riddle. This time, it's a riddle no one has heard before. They all make checks, roll for stink, and ODB's character succeeds.</p><p></p><p>First, I try to offer a hint, to get ODB himself to get to the answer. After the hint, Easy E laughs and smiles. He's figured it out. ODB hasn't, and, after a few minutes, Easy E just tells ODB the answer. ODB goes "Ooooooh." </p><p></p><p>In-character, ODB's character figured it out, period. Right away, didn't need a hint.</p><p></p><p>Out of character, it was Easy E who figured it out (and then only after a hint).</p><p></p><p>I'd prefer <em>some</em> player to figure out a puzzle or a riddle, because that helps immersion. Of course, even if they do, it doesn't mean that their characters do, since their characters are not themselves. A success is a success -- I'm not going to take it from you even if you can't figure out the riddle -- but I'm going to give the players a chance to figure it out for themselves, since that's better than me just telling you what it is. I will tell you what it is, though, if everyone remains clueless.</p><p></p><p>The dice tell me what happens in the world. Sometimes you roll low, sometimes you roll high, and your own personal knowledge won't help affect the fictional reality of the world any more than your own personal knowledge that Frodo and Sam make it back to the Shire safely helps the characters as they climb Mount Doom. I don't care if you know how to drive a stick shift. Your pseudo-medieval druid likely does not. I don't care if you know kendo. Your cloistered wizard does not (though perhaps your friend's fighter does!). I don't care if you've written a book about riddles. Your halfling rogue...well, actually, maybe he did. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 5748148, member: 2067"] I imagine players educated as metallurgists and experts in medieval combat and 16th-century English Lit are frustrated that they can't apply that knowledge, too. But they can't, because the essence of playing a role is pretending that you are that character, and that means that if the character can't figure out the puzzle, you don't get to figure out the puzzle. Well, that's speaking too harshly. Say you're an INT 3 Barbarian who couldn't solve a riddle for beans, but we're playing a table with Jeff, who is playing an INT 20 Wizard. But [I]Jeff[/I] can't solve a riddle for beans. If you figure out the riddle, and Jeff rolls a success, you as a player solve the riddle, even if the words you say are temporarily coming out of the mouth of Jeff's Wizard. So [I]you[/I] can figure out the riddle, but your character cannot. Jeff can't figure out the riddle, but Jeff's character can. Of course, if Jeff's roll was low and Jeff's Character can't solve the riddle, and no one else can either, it doesn't matter if you personally know the answer or not. Your characters do not. Y'know, in a horror movie, when you're watching from the monster's perspective as it advances on the vulnerable young ditz out wandering in the spooky forest, no matter how loud you yell, "TURN AROUND, DON'T GO IN THAT ABANDONED MILL, CALL THE COPS," it doesn't matter. The character doesn't do those things. It's not in her character to do them. It doesn't matter if you personally would avoid getting chopped to bits in an abandoned mill -- the character does not. That makes a good horror movie -- it builds tension, it creates its own artificial reality, it keeps things dramatic and interesting. That kind of in-character consistency is more important in my games than how particularly good Bill is at solving riddles. For me, it's a role-playing game, not a riddle-solving game. Riddle-solving games can be fun, but they are a different kind of game -- one that specifically doesn't involve pretending to be a magical elf if you want to play it. You don't have to worry if Bill's Character would know the answer, because Bill doesn't have a character, it's just Bill. Not that I'd take your style from you, of course. You don't play with such a wall between what you know and what your character knows, that's fine. Whatever makes the game fun for you, y'know? It just would ruin [I]my[/I] fun, which comes much more from the imagination and creativity and unexpected chaos that comes from being in-character. Yeah, sorry about the lack of clarity. To be more specific, the situation would be like this. The party meets the Sphinx, who threatens to eat them if they can't answer her riddle, so she asks it. Now, let's say that Tupac and Biggie already know the answer. But Easy E and ODB do not. Players will likely talk out of character for a while, and everyone knowing the answer (or knowing that Tupac and Biggie know) is pretty inevitable. But their [I]characters[/I] still haven't given the correct answer. Their characters try to answer the riddle, but fail their INT checks (or whatever). So regardless Tupac and Biggie (and possibly all the players) already knowing the answer, nobody's characters know the answer. The Sphinx sighs and eats them. Later, perhaps now with characters that have a robust INT score, Tupac, Biggie, Easy E, and ODB encounter the Sphinx again, and she asks a different riddle. This time, it's a riddle no one has heard before. They all make checks, roll for stink, and ODB's character succeeds. First, I try to offer a hint, to get ODB himself to get to the answer. After the hint, Easy E laughs and smiles. He's figured it out. ODB hasn't, and, after a few minutes, Easy E just tells ODB the answer. ODB goes "Ooooooh." In-character, ODB's character figured it out, period. Right away, didn't need a hint. Out of character, it was Easy E who figured it out (and then only after a hint). I'd prefer [I]some[/I] player to figure out a puzzle or a riddle, because that helps immersion. Of course, even if they do, it doesn't mean that their characters do, since their characters are not themselves. A success is a success -- I'm not going to take it from you even if you can't figure out the riddle -- but I'm going to give the players a chance to figure it out for themselves, since that's better than me just telling you what it is. I will tell you what it is, though, if everyone remains clueless. The dice tell me what happens in the world. Sometimes you roll low, sometimes you roll high, and your own personal knowledge won't help affect the fictional reality of the world any more than your own personal knowledge that Frodo and Sam make it back to the Shire safely helps the characters as they climb Mount Doom. I don't care if you know how to drive a stick shift. Your pseudo-medieval druid likely does not. I don't care if you know kendo. Your cloistered wizard does not (though perhaps your friend's fighter does!). I don't care if you've written a book about riddles. Your halfling rogue...well, actually, maybe he did. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should strong players have an advantage?
Top