Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should the +1 Sword Exist in 5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Essenti" data-source="post: 5847567" data-attributes="member: 100205"><p>This is one of the most horrible aspects of +X items... "oh looky... a new +2 Battleaxe, guess I can just chuck this here +1 in ye ole bag-o-stuff-to-sell since it's practically worthless now."</p><p></p><p>I've been playing D&D since the late 80s and +X items were boring back then and just as boring now. We tried giving them all unique names and nifty histories--and although that helped and sometimes (rarely) made people want to hold onto them a wee bit longer--generally they lost their <em>magic</em> as soon as some other shiny X+1 item showed up. They have existed in the game for a long long time, but they are more of a pariah than an icon. Some sacred cows only smell like sacred cows. </p><p></p><p>+X items are overtly gamist constructs, protected and hiding behind the immense joy and nostalgia a player felt upon discovering that first magic item. +X items can be safely ignored by the core rules because it is so easy to add them back in if you want them. Literally all you need to do is write +X in the name, and poof, done. Omitting +X magic items from the core rules will not ruin the game nor lessen the awe a new player feels upon finding their first magic item. Continuing the tradition of handing out +1 items as a first taste for magical loot is not something I feel the rules should continue pushing on new DMs. </p><p></p><p>Will it really bother me if they have +X items in DDN? Not at all! I can and will ignore them as I have learned to do. I like to make up my own unique items anyway.</p><p></p><p>Do I feel the game would be better served if WoTC focuses on more meaningful, unique, and interesting magical items (especially for those early levels)? Absolutely!</p><p></p><p>+X items are only a sacred cow for the sake of wanting another sacred cow. It might smell like a cow, but if I found one in my 5e back yard, I would do my best to avoid stepping in it.</p><p></p><p>MOO.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Essenti, post: 5847567, member: 100205"] This is one of the most horrible aspects of +X items... "oh looky... a new +2 Battleaxe, guess I can just chuck this here +1 in ye ole bag-o-stuff-to-sell since it's practically worthless now." I've been playing D&D since the late 80s and +X items were boring back then and just as boring now. We tried giving them all unique names and nifty histories--and although that helped and sometimes (rarely) made people want to hold onto them a wee bit longer--generally they lost their [I]magic[/I] as soon as some other shiny X+1 item showed up. They have existed in the game for a long long time, but they are more of a pariah than an icon. Some sacred cows only smell like sacred cows. +X items are overtly gamist constructs, protected and hiding behind the immense joy and nostalgia a player felt upon discovering that first magic item. +X items can be safely ignored by the core rules because it is so easy to add them back in if you want them. Literally all you need to do is write +X in the name, and poof, done. Omitting +X magic items from the core rules will not ruin the game nor lessen the awe a new player feels upon finding their first magic item. Continuing the tradition of handing out +1 items as a first taste for magical loot is not something I feel the rules should continue pushing on new DMs. Will it really bother me if they have +X items in DDN? Not at all! I can and will ignore them as I have learned to do. I like to make up my own unique items anyway. Do I feel the game would be better served if WoTC focuses on more meaningful, unique, and interesting magical items (especially for those early levels)? Absolutely! +X items are only a sacred cow for the sake of wanting another sacred cow. It might smell like a cow, but if I found one in my 5e back yard, I would do my best to avoid stepping in it. MOO. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should the +1 Sword Exist in 5E?
Top