Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should the DM accommodate characters, or characters accommodate DMs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Beginning of the End" data-source="post: 5096980" data-attributes="member: 55271"><p>Either the guy with the mount has the choice to go where his mount will be useful or he doesn't. If he doesn't have that choice, the GM is railroading.</p><p></p><p>Remove the railroad and the player's self-interest will take care of itself.</p><p></p><p>Now, the start of a campaign is a different matter. It's not a railroad to say "this is a campaign set on a chain of islands" or "in the middle of the desert" or "in the Underdark". The player can either design an appropriate character, deal with the consequences, or not play. The GM's only responsibility is to clearly communicate the concept, and the limitations of that concept are no more unreasonable than saying "you can't play a spaceship pilot in a campaign about modern FBI agents".</p><p></p><p>But you'll notice that, once again, freedom is given to the player. And they can use that freedom to address that issue in whatever they want.</p><p></p><p>The point is that the GM only needs to worry about being a nanny if he insists on treating his players like children.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, then. You have a problem. You have created it for yourself by choosing to railroad your players.</p><p></p><p>Long story short:</p><p></p><p>(1) If you, as the GM, don't want the responsibility of catering to your players, then don't run a railroad. This allows the players to cater to themselves and you don't have to worry about it.</p><p></p><p>(2) If you, as the GM, want to railroad your players, then you have a responsibility to cater to them.</p><p></p><p>The third option is that you're railroading your players in order to prevent them from doing things they find fun and/or force them to do things they don't want to do. Why the hell would you want to do that?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Re: Mounts. Invest in some magic items. <em>Horseshoes of the Zephyr</em> will open up quite a few terrains. A little ingenuity should allow for transportable extradimensional stables (similar to a <em>bag of holding</em>, but with breathable air; or using a traditional <em>bag of holding</em> while putting the mount in some form of stasis) or resizing of the mount to lead them through tight spaces.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Beginning of the End, post: 5096980, member: 55271"] Either the guy with the mount has the choice to go where his mount will be useful or he doesn't. If he doesn't have that choice, the GM is railroading. Remove the railroad and the player's self-interest will take care of itself. Now, the start of a campaign is a different matter. It's not a railroad to say "this is a campaign set on a chain of islands" or "in the middle of the desert" or "in the Underdark". The player can either design an appropriate character, deal with the consequences, or not play. The GM's only responsibility is to clearly communicate the concept, and the limitations of that concept are no more unreasonable than saying "you can't play a spaceship pilot in a campaign about modern FBI agents". But you'll notice that, once again, freedom is given to the player. And they can use that freedom to address that issue in whatever they want. The point is that the GM only needs to worry about being a nanny if he insists on treating his players like children. Well, then. You have a problem. You have created it for yourself by choosing to railroad your players. Long story short: (1) If you, as the GM, don't want the responsibility of catering to your players, then don't run a railroad. This allows the players to cater to themselves and you don't have to worry about it. (2) If you, as the GM, want to railroad your players, then you have a responsibility to cater to them. The third option is that you're railroading your players in order to prevent them from doing things they find fun and/or force them to do things they don't want to do. Why the hell would you want to do that? Re: Mounts. Invest in some magic items. [i]Horseshoes of the Zephyr[/i] will open up quite a few terrains. A little ingenuity should allow for transportable extradimensional stables (similar to a [i]bag of holding[/i], but with breathable air; or using a traditional [i]bag of holding[/i] while putting the mount in some form of stasis) or resizing of the mount to lead them through tight spaces. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should the DM accommodate characters, or characters accommodate DMs?
Top