Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should the DM accommodate characters, or characters accommodate DMs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rel" data-source="post: 5099805" data-attributes="member: 99"><p>Hussar, I think one concept that is vital for a good player to understand is that there is a lot of difference between a genre appropriate archetype (as found in literature, TV or movies) and what makes a good character AND a good attitude for a cooperative <strong>group </strong>game. There are tons of examples I can think of where even though a character concept might be valid in the genre it still translates to a complete pain in the ass.</p><p></p><p>What about a sneaky thief who always wants to sneak ahead of the party and scout things out? We see threads about this kind of thing not infrequently around here where, because of the thief player, the group has to spend a bunch of time waiting while this PC has a short solo-adventure scouting the enemy and checking for traps while the remainder of the group twiddles their thumbs.</p><p></p><p>In a case like that, were I the GM, I'd try to get the player to agree that most of the time I'm going to keep it very brief and simply say, "You scout ahead and discover that it's a dead end corridor." or "You scout ahead, discover that there is a group of seven Troglodytes, one of them with a weird looking staff with feathers on it, and return to the group." I'd also tell them that once in a while we'll do a more in depth thing where his scouting will be vital to getting information that might make an encounter significantly more interesting to the rest of the group.</p><p></p><p>IF the player is fine with those baseline assumptions then great. If not then they can either pick another character concept or prepare themselves for disappointment.</p><p></p><p>Because there is, in my mind, really only one important rule and that is that we need to be spending the large majority of our time as close as possible to the center point of the fun around which our playstyles balance. You are entitled to your character concept only insofar as it does not impinge on the overall fun of the group. Demanding more than that simply runs afoul of the "don't be a jerk" rule.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rel, post: 5099805, member: 99"] Hussar, I think one concept that is vital for a good player to understand is that there is a lot of difference between a genre appropriate archetype (as found in literature, TV or movies) and what makes a good character AND a good attitude for a cooperative [B]group [/B]game. There are tons of examples I can think of where even though a character concept might be valid in the genre it still translates to a complete pain in the ass. What about a sneaky thief who always wants to sneak ahead of the party and scout things out? We see threads about this kind of thing not infrequently around here where, because of the thief player, the group has to spend a bunch of time waiting while this PC has a short solo-adventure scouting the enemy and checking for traps while the remainder of the group twiddles their thumbs. In a case like that, were I the GM, I'd try to get the player to agree that most of the time I'm going to keep it very brief and simply say, "You scout ahead and discover that it's a dead end corridor." or "You scout ahead, discover that there is a group of seven Troglodytes, one of them with a weird looking staff with feathers on it, and return to the group." I'd also tell them that once in a while we'll do a more in depth thing where his scouting will be vital to getting information that might make an encounter significantly more interesting to the rest of the group. IF the player is fine with those baseline assumptions then great. If not then they can either pick another character concept or prepare themselves for disappointment. Because there is, in my mind, really only one important rule and that is that we need to be spending the large majority of our time as close as possible to the center point of the fun around which our playstyles balance. You are entitled to your character concept only insofar as it does not impinge on the overall fun of the group. Demanding more than that simply runs afoul of the "don't be a jerk" rule. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Should the DM accommodate characters, or characters accommodate DMs?
Top